[2017] KEELC 2178 (KLR)
The court found that the appeal had remained unprosecuted for a long time and that the appellant failed to appear or take steps to prosecute the matter. In the absence of any explanation or opposition from the appellant, and upon the request of the 1st respondent, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] KEELC 2178 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Kanampiu Nchau; Respondent: Rithaa Nchau; Respondent: Ruth Riungu Nkabune
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 17 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Dismissal, Want of Prosecution, Court Attendance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kanampiu Nchau
Appellant
Rithaa Nchau
Respondent
Ruth Riungu Nkabune
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appeal had remained unprosecuted for a long time and that the appellant failed to appear or take steps to prosecute the matter. In the absence of any explanation or opposition from the appellant, and upon the request of the 1st respondent, the court exercised its discretion to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. No order as to costs was made.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed for want of prosecution
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- No costs are awarded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT AT CHUKA
CHUKA ELC [CA] CASE NO 17 OF 2017
FORMERLY MERU ELC [CA]CASE NO.183 OF 2013
KANAMPIU NCHAU……………..........APPELLANT
VERSUS
RITHAA NCHAU …………....….1ST RESPONDENT
RUTH RIUNGU NKABUNE…….2ND RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This Appeal was listed for dismissal on 13th July, 2017 when only the 1st Respondent appeared.
2. The 1st respondent asked that the appeal be dismissed as it had remained unprosecuted for a long time.
3. This Appeal merits dismissal.
4. The Appeal is dismissed.
5. No costs are awarded.
6It is so ordered.
Delivered in open court at Chuka this 13th day of July, 2017 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Rithaa Nchau – 1st Respondent
P.M. NJOROGE
JUDGE