[2021] KEELC 3369 (KLR)
The court found that the inhibition order registered against Land Parcel No. KARINGANI/MARIANI/395 was expressly intended to subsist only until the finalization of the suit. Judgment was delivered on 16th March 2021, thereby concluding the matter. Since the court did not make any further order to extend or maintain...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEELC 3369 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kanga Mwirabua; Plaintiff: Mbiuki Mwirabua; Plaintiff: Ciambere Kangangi; Plaintiff: Ciamui Kangangi; Plaintiff: John Mutegi Kangangi; Plaintiff: Kaburu Kangangi; Plaintiff: Kaari Kangangi; Plaintiff: Ciambaka Kangangi; Plaintiff: Nyaga Mpungu; Plaintiff: Kagendo Ciambaka; Plaintiff: Kithinji Kaburu; Plaintiff: Muthoni Mutegi; Plaintiff: Baini Nkari; Respondent: Ndereba Naichu
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 19 of 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment Application for Lifting Inhibition
- Outcome
- Application granted; inhibition lifted.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Inhibition Orders, Land Registration, Post Judgment Applications
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kanga Mwirabua
Plaintiff
Mbiuki Mwirabua
Plaintiff
Ciambere Kangangi
Plaintiff
Ciamui Kangangi
Plaintiff
John Mutegi Kangangi
Plaintiff
Kaburu Kangangi
Plaintiff
Kaari Kangangi
Plaintiff
Ciambaka Kangangi
Plaintiff
Nyaga Mpungu
Plaintiff
Kagendo Ciambaka
Plaintiff
Kithinji Kaburu
Plaintiff
Muthoni Mutegi
Plaintiff
Baini Nkari
Plaintiff
Ndereba Naichu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment Application for Lifting Inhibition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the inhibition registered against Land Parcel No. KARINGANI/MARIANI/395 should be lifted following the final judgment.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to the removal of the inhibition to enjoy proprietary rights.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the inhibition order registered against Land Parcel No. KARINGANI/MARIANI/395 was expressly intended to subsist only until the finalization of the suit. Judgment was delivered on 16th March 2021, thereby concluding the matter. Since the court did not make any further order to extend or maintain the inhibition, and there was no pending dispute or appeal, the inhibition had lapsed by operation of law. The applicant was therefore entitled to have the inhibition lifted to enjoy full proprietary rights over the land. The court granted the application as prayed, lifting the inhibition and certifying the matter as urgent.
Court Disposition
Application granted; inhibition lifted.
Orders
- The matter is certified urgent and has been handled today in court.
- The inhibition registered against Land Parcel No. KARINGANI/MARIANI/395 on 18th October 2016 and any other encumbrance registered against the said land parcel is hereby lifted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
46 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT & LAND COURT
AT CHUKA
E.L.C. CASE NO. 19 OF 2019 (O.S.)
FORMERLY MERU E.L.C CASE NO. 83 OF 2016 (O.S)
KANGA MWIRABUA .......................................................... 1ST PLAINTIFF
MBIUKI MWIRABUA...........................................................2ND PLAINTIFF
CIAMBERE KANGANGI......................................................3RD PLAINTIFF
CIAMUI KANGANGI............................................................4TH PLAINTIFF
JOHN MUTEGI KANGANGI...............................................5TH PLAINTIFF
KABURU KANGANGI..........................................................6TH PLAINTIFF
KAARI KANGANGI..............................................................7TH PLAINTIFF
CIAMBAKA KANGANGI......................................................8TH PLAINTIFF
NYAGA MPUNGU...................................................................9TH PLAINTIFF
KAGENDO CIAMBAKA.....................................................10TH PLAINTIFF
KITHINJI KABURU.............................................................11TH PLAINTIFF
MUTHONI MUTEGI.............................................................12TH PLAINTIFF
BAINI NKARI........................................................................13TH PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
NDEREBA NAICHU.................................................................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. This application seeks the following orders:
1. THAT the Honorable Court do certify this application as urgent.
2. THAT the Honorable Court be pleased to lift the inhibition registered against Land Parcel No. KARINGANI/MARIANI/395 on 18th October 2016 and any other encumbrance registered against the said land parcel.
2. The application has the following grounds:
(i)That the orders of inhibition issued on 10th October 2016 and registered on 18th October 2016 were to subsist until the suit was finalized.
(ii)That the judgment delivered on 16th March 2021 by this Honorable Court finalized the matter.
(iii)That it is therefore in the interests of justice that the encumbrance be lifted to enable the applicant enjoy his proprietary rights unhindered.
3. The application is supported by the affidavit of Ndereba Naichu, the applicant, sworn on 5th May, 2021 which states:
INDEREBA NAICHUof P.O. Box Chuka, Tharaka Nithi County within the Republic of Kenya do hereby MAKE OATH and state as follows:
1. THAT I am the Applicant herein thereby competent to make and swear this affidavit.
2. THATon 10th October 2016, the plaintiffs/respondents were granted orders of inhibition stopping any dealings with land parcel no. Karingani/Mariani/395 until this suit was finalized. These orders were registered on 18th October 2016.
3. THATthe present suit was finalized by the judgment of this Honorable Court on 16th March 2021.
4. THAT the court however did not make an order to lift the inhibition registered against the suit land yet the same lapsed upon determination of the suit.
5. THATI therefore pray that the inhibition registered on 18th October 2016 be lifted.
6. THATwhat is stated above is true and to the best of my knowledge information and belief save where otherwise stated.
4. Advocate Muriithi told the court that the applicant seeks removal of the apposite inhibition in terms of prayer 2 in the application because the suit had been heard and determined with judgment having been delivered on 16th March, 2021.
5. In the circumstances,
a) The matter is certified urgent and has been handled today in court.
b) Prayer 2 is granted.
c) Costs shall be in the cause.
Delivered in open Court at Chuka this 10th day of May, 2021 in the presence of:
CA: Ndegwa
Mark Muriithi h/b Kaumbi for the Applicant
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE