[2021] KEELC 3369 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 3369 (KLR)

The court found that the inhibition order registered against Land Parcel No. KARINGANI/MARIANI/395 was expressly intended to subsist only until the finalization of the suit. Judgment was delivered on 16th March 2021, thereby concluding the matter. Since the court did not make any further order to extend or maintain...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 3369 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kanga Mwirabua; Plaintiff: Mbiuki Mwirabua; Plaintiff: Ciambere Kangangi; Plaintiff: Ciamui Kangangi; Plaintiff: John Mutegi Kangangi; Plaintiff: Kaburu Kangangi; Plaintiff: Kaari Kangangi; Plaintiff: Ciambaka Kangangi; Plaintiff: Nyaga Mpungu; Plaintiff: Kagendo Ciambaka; Plaintiff: Kithinji Kaburu; Plaintiff: Muthoni Mutegi; Plaintiff: Baini Nkari; Respondent: Ndereba Naichu
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Chuka
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 19 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment Application for Lifting Inhibition
Outcome
Application granted; inhibition lifted.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Inhibition Orders, Land Registration, Post Judgment Applications
Source Language
en
Land and Property Inhibition Orders Land Registration Post Judgment Applications

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kanga Mwirabua

Plaintiff

Mbiuki Mwirabua

Plaintiff

Ciambere Kangangi

Plaintiff

Ciamui Kangangi

Plaintiff

John Mutegi Kangangi

Plaintiff

Kaburu Kangangi

Plaintiff

Kaari Kangangi

Plaintiff

Ciambaka Kangangi

Plaintiff

Nyaga Mpungu

Plaintiff

Kagendo Ciambaka

Plaintiff

Kithinji Kaburu

Plaintiff

Muthoni Mutegi

Plaintiff

Baini Nkari

Plaintiff

Ndereba Naichu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Post Judgment Application for Lifting Inhibition

  1. 1 Whether the inhibition registered against Land Parcel No. KARINGANI/MARIANI/395 should be lifted following the final judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to the removal of the inhibition to enjoy proprietary rights.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the inhibition order registered against Land Parcel No. KARINGANI/MARIANI/395 was expressly intended to subsist only until the finalization of the suit. Judgment was delivered on 16th March 2021, thereby concluding the matter. Since the court did not make any further order to extend or maintain the inhibition, and there was no pending dispute or appeal, the inhibition had lapsed by operation of law. The applicant was therefore entitled to have the inhibition lifted to enjoy full proprietary rights over the land. The court granted the application as prayed, lifting the inhibition and certifying the matter as urgent.

Court Disposition

Application granted; inhibition lifted.

Orders

  • The matter is certified urgent and has been handled today in court.
  • The inhibition registered against Land Parcel No. KARINGANI/MARIANI/395 on 18th October 2016 and any other encumbrance registered against the said land parcel is hereby lifted.