[2024] KECPT 1530 (KLR)

[2024] KECPT 1530 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the claimant had properly resigned from the respondent Sacco by letter dated 09/05/2022, as evidenced by an acknowledgment. While the claimant was entitled to a refund of his deposits, the law (Section 34 of the Cooperative Societies Act) allows the Sacco to set off any outstanding loan...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KECPT 1530 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Andrew Kiplimo Kangogo; Respondent: Sokoro Sacco Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 867 (E959) of 2022
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Claim / Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant with setoff; partial refund ordered.
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Cooperative Societies, Member Withdrawal, Setoff of Deposits, Loan Repayment, By Laws Enforcement
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Cooperative Societies Member Withdrawal Setoff of Deposits Loan Repayment By Laws Enforcement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Kiplimo Kangogo

Applicant

Sokoro Sacco Society Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Claim / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claimant properly resigned from the respondent Sacco and is entitled to a refund of his deposits.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent is entitled to set off the claimant's outstanding loan against his deposits before refunding any balance.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant had properly resigned from the respondent Sacco by letter dated 09/05/2022, as evidenced by an acknowledgment. While the claimant was entitled to a refund of his deposits, the law (Section 34 of the Cooperative Societies Act) allows the Sacco to set off any outstanding loan against the member's deposits. The respondent's by-law purporting to bar resignation with an outstanding loan was void to the extent it contradicted the Act, provided the deposits exceeded the loan. The Tribunal accepted the respondent's evidence of the outstanding loan and interest, which the claimant did not dispute. After setting off the loan balance and interest from the...

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant with setoff; partial refund ordered.

Orders

  • Immediate refund of Ksh. 47,349/- to the claimant.
  • Costs of the suit together with interest from date of filing at Tribunal rates until payment in full.