[2021] KEELC 2595 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 2595 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs had established a prima facie case with a probability of success regarding the disputed subdivision and registration of the suit parcels and the purported dissolution of the group ranch. The court held that the plaintiffs stood to suffer irreparable loss if the land was disposed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 2595 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kanyarkwat Group Ranch; Plaintiff: Julius Longurokwang; Plaintiff: Philip Chemala Ruto; Plaintiff: Lokorluka Lotunale; Plaintiff: Joseph Ngiruye; Defendant: Meringiro Lokadir Joseph; Defendant: Antony Mukeluk Tongolo; Defendant: Lomangiro Investment Limited; Defendant: The Land Registrar, West Pokot County
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 38 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction and Stay of Proceedings
Outcome
application granted in terms specified
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Land Title Disputes, Group Ranch Dissolution, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Temporary Injunctions Land Title Disputes Group Ranch Dissolution Stay of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kanyarkwat Group Ranch

Plaintiff

Julius Longurokwang

Plaintiff

Philip Chemala Ruto

Plaintiff

Lokorluka Lotunale

Plaintiff

Joseph Ngiruye

Plaintiff

Meringiro Lokadir Joseph

Defendant

Antony Mukeluk Tongolo

Defendant

Lomangiro Investment Limited

Defendant

The Land Registrar, West Pokot County

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Interlocutory Application for Temporary Injunction and Stay of Proceedings

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs have established a prima facie case to warrant the grant of a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from dealing with the suit properties.
  2. 2 Whether the proceedings in Kitale ELC No. 30 of 2017 should be stayed pending the determination of the present suit.
  3. 3 Whether the purported dissolution and subdivision of Kanyarkwat Group Ranch should be suspended pending the hearing and determination of the consolidated suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs had established a prima facie case with a probability of success regarding the disputed subdivision and registration of the suit parcels and the purported dissolution of the group ranch. The court held that the plaintiffs stood to suffer irreparable loss if the land was disposed of before the suit was determined, as the parcels were substantial and the defendants' ability to compensate was uncertain. The court also determined that consolidating the present suit with Kitale ELC No. 30 of 2017 and staying proceedings in the latter would prevent prejudice and promote judicial efficiency. Consequently, the court granted a temporary injunction restraining...

Court Disposition

application granted in terms specified

Orders

  • Defendants and their agents are restrained by temporary injunction from trespassing, developing, transferring, selling, disposing of, charging, dealing with, or interfering in any manner with title deeds No. West Pokot/Kanyarkwat “B”/3 and West Pokot/Kanyarkwat “B”/6 pending hearing and determination of the main suit.
  • The instant suit is consolidated with Kitale ELC No. 30 of 2017 for purposes of a single judgment for both suits.