[2021] KEELC 1190 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 1190 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, having purchased portions of the suit land from the 1st defendant and claiming a stake in the property, have a direct and recognizable interest in the subject matter of the proceedings. Their rights would be adversely affected if they are not included as interested parties. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 1190 (KLR)
Parties
Respondent: Kaptich Farmers Group (Through Ezekiel Maritim, Joseah Chepkosiom and Elijah Chepkwony as the Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer); Defendant: Samson Maitamei Kapeen; Defendant: James Kipteng; Defendant: Estate of Norman Kilakoi Ole Lepore (Deceased); Applicant: Hellen Koskei & 45 Others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Narok
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case of 20 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Joinder of Interested Parties
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
MN Kullow
Legal Topics
Joinder of Parties, Interested Party Status, Land Ownership Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Joinder of Parties Interested Party Status Land Ownership Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kaptich Farmers Group (Through Ezekiel Maritim, Joseah Chepkosiom and Elijah Chepkwony as the Chairman, Secretary and Treasurer)

Respondent

Samson Maitamei Kapeen

Defendant

James Kipteng

Defendant

Estate of Norman Kilakoi Ole Lepore (Deceased)

Defendant

Hellen Koskei & 45 Others

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Application for Joinder of Interested Parties

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be enjoined as interested parties in the suit concerning land parcel NAROK/CIS/MARA-OLOLOLUNGA/127.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants have a sufficient stake in the subject matter to warrant their inclusion as interested parties.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, having purchased portions of the suit land from the 1st defendant and claiming a stake in the property, have a direct and recognizable interest in the subject matter of the proceedings. Their rights would be adversely affected if they are not included as interested parties. The court relied on the definition of an interested party in Black's Law Dictionary and the Supreme Court's pronouncement in Communications Commission of Kenya & 4 others vs Royal Media Services Limited & 7 others, holding that the applicants' stake in the proceedings entitles them to protection of their rights through joinder. The application for joinder was therefore merited and...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 28/7/2020 is allowed.
  • The intended/interested parties are enjoined in the suit as the 1st to 46th interested parties.