[2024] KEELC 5543 (KLR)
The court found that it is not mandatory to join the Hon. Attorney General as a party in every suit against government officers. Section 12(1) of the Government Proceedings Act and relevant case law provide that joinder is only necessary where the presence of the Hon. AG is required for the enforcement of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 5543 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Geoffrey Kinja Karanca; Defendant: County Government Of Meru; Defendant: Chief Land Registrar; Defendant: County Land Registrar Meru; Defendant: Director Of Surveys; Defendant: County Director Of Surveys, Meru; Defendant: National Housing Corporation
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case E008 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Joinder of Attorney General
- Outcome
- Objection dismissed; no amendment to join Hon. Attorney General required.
- Judges
- CK Nzili
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Government Proceedings, Land Title Disputes
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Geoffrey Kinja Karanca
Plaintiff
County Government Of Meru
Defendant
Chief Land Registrar
Defendant
County Land Registrar Meru
Defendant
Director Of Surveys
Defendant
County Director Of Surveys, Meru
Defendant
National Housing Corporation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Joinder of Attorney General
Legal Issues
- 1 Is it mandatory to join the Hon. Attorney General as a party in suits against government officers such as the Chief Land Registrar and Director of Surveys?
- 2 Does Section 12 of the Government Proceedings Act require amendment of pleadings to include the Hon. Attorney General in this case?
- 3 Are the 2nd–5th defendants able to defend the suit without the Hon. Attorney General being joined?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that it is not mandatory to join the Hon. Attorney General as a party in every suit against government officers. Section 12(1) of the Government Proceedings Act and relevant case law provide that joinder is only necessary where the presence of the Hon. AG is required for the enforcement of the ultimate order or decree, or where the issues cannot be effectively adjudicated without their participation. In this case, the 2nd–5th defendants failed to demonstrate how the inclusion of the Hon. AG would assist in answering the issues pleaded by the plaintiff. The court held that the suit could proceed without amending the plaint to include the Hon. AG, and the plaintiff is at...
Court Disposition
Objection dismissed; no amendment to join Hon. Attorney General required.
Orders
- The request to amend the plaint to include the Hon. Attorney General as a party is declined.
- The suit shall proceed as per the law without the Hon. Attorney General as a party.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
Karanca v County Government of Meru & 5 others (Environment & Land Case E008 of 2023) [2024] KEELC 5543 (KLR) (17 July 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 5543 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Meru
Environment & Land Case E008 of 2023
CK Nzili, J
July 17, 2024
Between
Geoffrey Kinja Karanca
Plaintiff
and
The County Government Of Meru
1st Defendant
The Chief Land Registrar
2nd Defendant
The County Land Registrar Meru
3rd Defendant
The Director Of Surveys
4th Defendant
The County Director Of Surveys, Meru
5th Defendant
The National Housing Corporation
6th Defendant
Ruling
1. When this matter came up for hearing on 13. 6.2024, learned litigation counsel representing the 2nd & 3rd defendants told the court that Section 12 of the Government Proceedings Act had not been complied with by the plaintiff to include the Hon. Attorney General as a party to the suit. The counsel insisted that the pleadings by the plaintiff have to be amended to formally bring on board the Hon. AG so that a statement of defence can be filed.
2. Learned counsels Mr. Opulu and Maithya for the plaintiff submitted that their client had no complaint against the Hon. AG.
3. They termed the issue raised by the 2nd and 3rd defendants for not filing a statement as a delaying tactic.
4. Mr. Opulu submitted that the Chief Land Registrar and the director of surveys were capable of being sued without joining the Hon. AG.
5. In a rejoinder, Miss Mbaikyatta learned counsel submitted that unless the Hon. AG was joined, government officers such as the 2nd and 3rd defendants could not be defended by the Hon. AG.
6. The question as to whether it is mandatory to sue the A.G. was tackled in the Council of Governors and Others vs Senate & others (2015) eKLR. The court said that whereas the constitution allows the Hon. AG the right to represent the national government in court proceedings, it does not mandatory stipulate that the Hon. AG should be sued in all instances where the organ of a national government has been sued.
7. Section 12 (1) of the Government Proceedings Act provides the subject to the provisions of any written law Civil proceedings by or against the government shall be instituted by or against the A.G as the case might be. Under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) Civil Procedure Rules to join a party is the discretion of a party by moving the court where there is a necessity or whose presence will enable the court to effectually and completely adjudicate upon a matter. It can happen at any stage of a suit. See JMK vs MWN & another (2015) eKLR. He or she must be a necessary party where the ultimate order or decree cannot be enforced without his participation. See Julius Meme vs Republic & another (2004) eKLR.
8. The suit before the court is against the 2nd – 4th defendants touching on their role regarding the plaintiff's title to land. The Hon. AG is not answering for the issues raised against the 2nd – 5th defendants.
9. The 2nd – 5th defendants have not stated how the necessity of the Hon. AG will help them in answering the issues pleaded by the plaintiff against them.
10. The upshot is I find no basis to order that the plaint be amended to include the Hon. AG as a substantive party to the suit if the 2nd – 5th defendants do not wish to defend the suit the matter shall proceed as per the law.
11. The plaintiff is at liberty to make the necessary applications in the absence of a statement of defence by the said parties.
DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS/OPEN COURT AT MERUON THIS 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2024In presence ofC.A Kananu/MukamiPlaintiffSituma for the 6th defendantMwirigi B for the 1st defendantMaithya for Opulu for the plaintiffMbaikyatta for the 2nd – 5th defendantHON. C K NZILIJUDGEELC E008 OF 2023 - RULING 0