[2023] KEELC 18606 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 18606 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiffs had demonstrated sufficient cause for the amendment of the plaint, as the Grant of Letters of Administration had been amended and Phaustine Ounoi Ochunga was no longer an administrator. Since the application was not opposed and the amendment was necessary to reflect the proper...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 18606 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Erneo Pamba Karani; Plaintiff: Stephen Oundo Barabara; Plaintiff: Meshack Ouma Omollo; Defendant: Silifano Juma Esakha; Defendant: Peter Ndungu Mwangi; Defendant: Joseph Mathenge Kinyori; Defendant: Stephen Mwani; Defendant: Joseph Misiko Olubero; Defendant: Hellen Ajiambo Makanda; Defendant: Okubasu Nyongesa Moses; Defendant: Wycliffe Ambetsa Oparanya; Defendant: Josephat John Maende; Defendant: Robert Asibiko; Defendant: Lydia Matendechere; Defendant: Stephen Wilberforce Amanya Makokha; Defendant: Richard Odongo Makokha; Defendant: Robert Okochi Barasa; Defendant: Alex Lurongo Mwindalo; Defendant: Daniel Njoroge Wanyoike; Defendant: Kirathimo Self Help Group; Defendant: Masinde Ajuma Gabriel; Defendant: Alois Okello Pamba; Defendant: Valentine Cherono; Defendant: Makokha Eunice Amoding; Defendant: Wycliffe Wanga Obunde; Defendant: Terry Achila Wotsembo; Defendant: John Ojuk Ongwindi; Defendant: Zacharia Kwendo Otieno; Defendant: John Riavi Ndeda; Defendant: Valaria Makokha Wafula; Defendant: Samuel Ogola Orege; Interested Party: Margaret Nelima Odhiambo
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Busia
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 166 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
BN Olao
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Letters of Administration, Personal Representatives, Estate Management
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Amendment of Pleadings Letters of Administration Personal Representatives Estate Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Erneo Pamba Karani

Plaintiff

Stephen Oundo Barabara

Plaintiff

Meshack Ouma Omollo

Plaintiff

Silifano Juma Esakha

Defendant

Peter Ndungu Mwangi

Defendant

Joseph Mathenge Kinyori

Defendant

Stephen Mwani

Defendant

Joseph Misiko Olubero

Defendant

Hellen Ajiambo Makanda

Defendant

Okubasu Nyongesa Moses

Defendant

Wycliffe Ambetsa Oparanya

Defendant

Josephat John Maende

Defendant

Robert Asibiko

Defendant

Lydia Matendechere

Defendant

Stephen Wilberforce Amanya Makokha

Defendant

Richard Odongo Makokha

Defendant

Robert Okochi Barasa

Defendant

Alex Lurongo Mwindalo

Defendant

Daniel Njoroge Wanyoike

Defendant

Kirathimo Self Help Group

Defendant

Masinde Ajuma Gabriel

Defendant

Alois Okello Pamba

Defendant

Valentine Cherono

Defendant

Makokha Eunice Amoding

Defendant

Wycliffe Wanga Obunde

Defendant

Terry Achila Wotsembo

Defendant

John Ojuk Ongwindi

Defendant

Zacharia Kwendo Otieno

Defendant

John Riavi Ndeda

Defendant

Valaria Makokha Wafula

Defendant

Samuel Ogola Orege

Defendant

Margaret Nelima Odhiambo

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Amend Plaint

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs should be granted leave to amend the plaint to substitute the name of Phaustine Ounoi Ochunga with Erneo Pamba Karani as a personal representative of the estate of Karani Malongo Omolo.
  2. 2 Whether the amended plaint should be deemed as duly filed upon receipt by the court.
  3. 3 Whether the parties should be allowed to file further lists of documents and witnesses.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiffs had demonstrated sufficient cause for the amendment of the plaint, as the Grant of Letters of Administration had been amended and Phaustine Ounoi Ochunga was no longer an administrator. Since the application was not opposed and the amendment was necessary to reflect the proper parties before the court, the court exercised its discretion to allow the amendment. The court further directed that the amended plaint be filed and served within 10 days, and that the defendants be at liberty to file amended defences within 14 days of service. All parties were also given liberty to file and serve further lists of witnesses and documents if necessary. No order as...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The plaint be amended as prayed.
  • The amended plaint be filed and served upon all the defendants within 10 days of this ruling.