[1986] KECA 16 (KLR)

[1986] KECA 16 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants' delay in filing the memorandum and record of appeal was due to a genuine misapprehension regarding the transmission of the High Court record. In the interests of justice and to allow the intended appeal to be properly ventilated, the court exercised its discretion to grant the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1986] KECA 16 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Karani; Respondent: Kijana
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Application 22 of 1986
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Time and Related Directions Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed in part; time extended for filing appeal documents; leave granted for further affidavits; stay of execution continued; no order as to costs.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Stay of Execution, Filing of Record of Appeal
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Stay of Execution Filing of Record of Appeal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Karani

Applicant

Kijana

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Interlocutory Application for Extension of Time and Related Directions Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be granted further time to file the memorandum and record of appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the respondents should be allowed to file additional affidavits and evidence.
  3. 3 Whether the stay of execution previously granted should be continued.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants' delay in filing the memorandum and record of appeal was due to a genuine misapprehension regarding the transmission of the High Court record. In the interests of justice and to allow the intended appeal to be properly ventilated, the court exercised its discretion to grant the applicants leave to file the memorandum and record of appeal within 60 days. The court also allowed the first respondent to file a fresh affidavit with relevant material within 40 days, and the second and third respondents to file affidavits in response within the same 60-day period. The ex parte stay of execution previously granted was continued to preserve the status quo...

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part; time extended for filing appeal documents; leave granted for further affidavits; stay of execution continued; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • Applicants granted leave to file memorandum and record of appeal within 60 days from October 10, 1986 (by December 9, 1986).
  • First respondent granted leave to file a fresh affidavit with relevant material within 40 days from October 10, 1986 (by November 19, 1986).