[2025] KEHC 8167 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant satisfied the three cumulative conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal: (1) The application was filed without unreasonable delay, as it was brought 17 days after the trial court's ruling. (2) The applicant demonstrated substantial loss may result if stay is not granted, since execution had commenced and the respondent did not show ability to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeds. (3) The applicant expressed willingness to provide security, and the court emphasized that security is for the court to determine. The court exercised its discretion to grant stay, balancing the right of appeal with the respondent's right to enjoy the...
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 8167 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Daniel Karanja; Respondent: Margaret Chesang
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2025
- Case Number
- Appeal E002 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.
- Judges
- RN Nyakundi
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeals Process, Security for Due Performance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Karanja
Applicant
Margaret Chesang
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has satisfied the conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the application for stay was filed without unreasonable delay.
- 3 Whether the applicant will suffer substantial loss if stay is not granted.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant satisfied the three cumulative conditions for grant of stay of execution pending appeal: (1) The application was filed without unreasonable delay, as it was brought 17 days after the trial court's ruling. (2) The applicant demonstrated substantial loss may result if stay is not granted, since execution had commenced and the respondent did not show ability to refund the decretal sum if the appeal succeeds. (3) The applicant expressed willingness to provide security, and the court emphasized that security is for the court to determine. The court exercised its discretion to grant stay, balancing the right of appeal with the respondent's right to enjoy the...
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution pending appeal allowed.
Orders
- Stay of execution of the judgment/decree in Eldoret SCCOMC No. E769 of 2024 pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
- The appellant shall file the record of appeal within 21 days and serve the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment