[2025] KEHC 3020 (KLR)
The court held that while the applicant presented medical reports indicating poor health, there was no evidence from the prison authorities regarding their capability to provide the necessary medical and dietary interventions. The court found that it could not determine whether the applicant's circumstances were...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 3020 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Clement Mwangi Karanja; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E011 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for bail pending appeal deferred pending further information.
- Judges
- EM Muriithi
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Exceptional Circumstances, Ill Health in Prison, Sexual Offences, Prison Medical Facilities
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clement Mwangi Karanja
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated exceptional or unusual circumstances to warrant grant of bail pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the medical facilities in prison are inadequate for the applicant's health condition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that while the applicant presented medical reports indicating poor health, there was no evidence from the prison authorities regarding their capability to provide the necessary medical and dietary interventions. The court found that it could not determine whether the applicant's circumstances were exceptional or unusual without such a report. Therefore, the court ordered that a report be obtained from the prison authorities on their medical facilities and capabilities before further consideration of the application for bail pending appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for bail pending appeal deferred pending further information.
Orders
- The Court calls for a report from the Prison Authorities on their medical facilities and capabilities to deal with the applicant's condition before further consideration of the application.
- Mention for further directions on 20/3/2025.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Karanja v Republic (Criminal Appeal E011 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 3020 (KLR) (13 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 3020 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kerugoya
Criminal Appeal E011 of 2025
EM Muriithi, J
March 13, 2025
Between
Clement Mwangi Karanja
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Appellant who is serving a sentence of imprisonment for 20 years for defilement contrary to section 8 (1) and (4) of the Sexual Offences Act beginning 24/1/2025 seeks bail pending appeal by a Notice of Motion dated 20/2/2025.
2. The primary ground for bail pending appeal is that he is in a poor health condition and that the present incarceration has seriously aggravated his state of health and the prison authorities are unable to provide the recommended special diet and that the prison facilities lack capability to supply him with lifesaving medicine.
3. The Appellant has exhibited medial reports on his condition from his private doctor and the County Hospital of Kirinyaga urging that the prison environment are not conducive to the management of his chronic health condition.
4. The DPP does not oppose the application for bail pending appeal and only urge in submissions filed in Court that the Court “interrogates the document attached more particularly medical documents attached and marked CMK 2, 3 and 4 and make appropriate action.”
5. The Court is mindful of the test in Jivraj Shah v. R (1986) KLR 605 with regard to applications for bail pending appeal that the principal consideration in such an application for bail pending appeal is the existence of exceptional or unusual circumstances upon which the Court can fairly conclude that it is in the interests of justice to grant bail.
6. As held in Dominic Karanja v. R (1986) KLR 612 “ill health per se does not constitute an exceptional or unusual circumstance in every case as there exists medical facilities for prisoners in the Country.”
7. Consequently, the applicant for bail pending appeal primarily founded on medical grounds must satisfy the Court that the hospital facilities available in the Prison environment are not sufficient to address his particular medical condition and health needs. The Court has seen the reports by the applicants’ two medical facilities but no report has been given by the Prison authorities on their capability, or otherwise, of dealing with the necessary medicinal and dietary interventions that the ailment suffered by the applicant demands.
Orders 8. Accordingly, the Court will call for such a report from the Prison Authorities on their Medical facilities and capabilities, or otherwise, to deal with the Applicant’s condition before further consideration of his application for bail pending appeal.
9. Mention for further directions on 20/3/2025. Order accordingly.
DATED AND DELIVERED ON THIS 13THDAY OF MARCH 2025. EDWARD M. MURIITHIJUDGEAppearances:Mr. Wainaina for Mr. Wandugi for the Appellant.Mr. Mamba for the DPP.2