[2025] KEHC 8765 (KLR)
The court held that bail pending appeal is not an absolute right but a discretionary remedy, only available in exceptional or unusual circumstances. The applicant failed to demonstrate that his appeal had overwhelming chances of success, as the alleged defect in the charge sheet was not evident at this interlocutory stage. The medical evidence provided was insufficient, lacking proper diagnosis or credible documentation, and there was no proof that prison facilities could not cater for the applicant's needs. Family hardship and marital discord do not amount to exceptional circumstances. The court found no justification to exercise its discretion in favour of the applicant and dismissed...
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 8765 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Lesley Kamande Karanja; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kajiado
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2025
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal E018 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- CW Meoli
- Legal Topics
- Bail Pending Appeal, Conviction on Plea, Defective Charge Sheet, Medical Grounds for Bail
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lesley Kamande Karanja
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Ruling on Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail pending appeal after conviction on own plea of guilty.
- 2 Whether the charge sheet was defective under the East Africa Community Vehicle Load Control Act, 2016.
- 3 Whether the applicant's medical condition or family circumstances constitute exceptional or unusual circumstances warranting bail pending appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that bail pending appeal is not an absolute right but a discretionary remedy, only available in exceptional or unusual circumstances. The applicant failed to demonstrate that his appeal had overwhelming chances of success, as the alleged defect in the charge sheet was not evident at this interlocutory stage. The medical evidence provided was insufficient, lacking proper diagnosis or credible documentation, and there was no proof that prison facilities could not cater for the applicant's needs. Family hardship and marital discord do not amount to exceptional circumstances. The court found no justification to exercise its discretion in favour of the applicant and dismissed...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for bail pending appeal dated 25.03.2025 is dismissed.
- The record of appeal to be filed so that the appeal can be perfected and heard without delay.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment