[2024] KEHC 9232 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 9232 (KLR)

The court found that the delay in filing the notice of appeal was satisfactorily explained by the applicant, citing file transmission and change of advocates, and that the delay was not inordinate. The court held that it could not validate an invalid notice of appeal but granted leave to file a fresh notice within...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 9232 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ann Wangari Karimi & Philip King'ori Ndiritu (Suing as legal representatives of the Estate of David Kiere Ndiritu - Deceased); Respondent: Joseph Kabugi King’Ori
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E004 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
DKN Magare
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Stay of Execution, Security for Appeal, Estate Administration
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Family and Children Leave to Appeal Out of Time Stay of Execution Security for Appeal Estate Administration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ann Wangari Karimi & Philip King'ori Ndiritu (Suing as legal representatives of the Estate of David Kiere Ndiritu - Deceased)

Applicant

Joseph Kabugi King’Ori

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time and Stay Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether stay of execution pending appeal should be granted and on what terms.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the delay in filing the notice of appeal was satisfactorily explained by the applicant, citing file transmission and change of advocates, and that the delay was not inordinate. The court held that it could not validate an invalid notice of appeal but granted leave to file a fresh notice within 14 days. On the issue of stay, the court applied Order 42 Rule 6, noting that the respondent conceded to the application, which amounted to an admission of potential loss, and that the applicant had offered security. The court therefore granted stay of execution pending appeal, conditional upon the applicant depositing the specified sum as security in a joint interest earning...

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to appeal to the Court of Appeal out of time; notice of appeal to be filed within 14 days.
  • Stay of execution pending appeal is granted on condition that the applicant deposits Kshs. 2,528,560 in a joint interest earning account by 30/8/2024 as security; in default, execution to issue.