[2025] KECA 444 (KLR)
The Court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely, that he was not furnished with the judgment in time. The respondent did not oppose the application and acknowledged the lengthy sentence as a factor. The Court exercised its discretion under Rule 4...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECA 444 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Anthony Munga Kariru; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Application E011 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- Application allowed.
- Judges
- PM Gachoka
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Defilement Offences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Munga Kariru
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against conviction and sentence.
- 2 Whether the delay in filing the appeal was sufficiently explained to warrant the court's discretion.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the applicant had provided a satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely, that he was not furnished with the judgment in time. The respondent did not oppose the application and acknowledged the lengthy sentence as a factor. The Court exercised its discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules to allow the application, holding that the threshold for extension of time had been met. The applicant was granted leave to file the notice of appeal within 14 days, and the record of appeal within 45 days thereafter.
Court Disposition
Application allowed.
Orders
- The applicant shall file his notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of this order.
- The record of appeal shall be filed and served within 45 days thereafter.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Kariru v Republic (Criminal Application E011 of 2025) [2025] KECA 444 (KLR) (7 March 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECA 444 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Nakuru
Criminal Application E011 of 2025
PM Gachoka, JA
March 7, 2025
Between
Anthony Munga Kariru
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(An application for leave to appeal out of time against the conviction and sentence of the High Court of Kenya at Naivasha (Nzioka, J.) delivered on 13th May 2024 in HCCRA No. E004 of 2022)
Ruling
1. In his Notice of Motion dated 31st January 2025, the applicant seeks the leave of this Court to appeal out of time against the conviction and sentence of the High Court sitting at Naivasha in HCCRA No. E004 of 2022. In Engineer CMC Criminal (SO) No. E003 of 2021, the applicant was charged with the offence of defilement contrary to section 8 (1) as read with section 8 (4) of the Sexual Offences Act. The matter went for full trial where the applicant was convicted and sentenced to fourteen years’ imprisonment. On appeal before the Naivasha High Court, Nzioka, J. dismissed the applicant’s appeal on conviction but enhanced his sentence to fifteen years’ imprisonment.
2. It is those findings that prompted the applicant to file the present application. It is supported by his affidavit sworn on 31st January 2025. He has urged this Court to consider that he was not furnished with the judgment timeously to enable him file his appeal on time.
3. The application was not opposed. In its written submissions dated 19th February 2025, the state, through Senior Assistant Director of Public Prosecutions Mr. Omutelema submitted that while there was a delay in filing the application, the same ought to be allowed since the sentence meted out was lengthy.
4. Rule 4 of this Court’s Rules provides that the Court may extend the time limited by these Rules for the doing of any act authorized or required by the Rules, whether before or after the doing of the act, and a reference in these Rules to any such time shall be construed as a reference to that time as extended.
5. I have considered the application, the supporting affidavit, the annexures thereto, the respondent’s submissions and the law. I am satisfied to hold that the application has met the threshold for the exercise of discretion by this Court. Accordingly, I direct the applicant to file his notice of appeal within 14 days from the date of this order. Thereafter, the record of appeal shall be filed and served within 45 days.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAKURU THIS 7TH DAY OF MARCH 2025. M. GACHOKA C.Arb, FCIArb.......................................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a True copy of the originalSignedDEPUTY REGISTRAR