[2023] KEHC 23593 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 23593 (KLR)

The court found that the issues in the present suit are substantially the same as those in JR Cause No 2 of 2017, which is still pending. The doctrine of sub-judice precludes the court from proceeding with this matter while the other suit is unresolved. The previous stay order issued on May 8, 2018, remains in force...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 23593 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: James Gacheru Kariuki; Plaintiff: Harrison Kariira Thuku; Plaintiff: George Kingiri Wanjohi; Plaintiff: David Ngugi Kabati; Plaintiff: Company Limited; Plaintiff: Ruth Mbecha; Plaintiff: Naomi Wanjiru Kiburu; Defendant: The County Government Of Kiambu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kiambu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 16 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Directions
Outcome
Suit to remain stayed; to be mentioned alongside JR Cause No 2 of 2017.
Judges
DO Chepkwony
Legal Topics
Sub Judice, Stay of Proceedings, Case Management
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Sub Judice Stay of Proceedings Case Management

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James Gacheru Kariuki

Plaintiff

Harrison Kariira Thuku

Plaintiff

George Kingiri Wanjohi

Plaintiff

David Ngugi Kabati

Plaintiff

Company Limited

Plaintiff

Ruth Mbecha

Plaintiff

Naomi Wanjiru Kiburu

Plaintiff

The County Government Of Kiambu

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Directions

  1. 1 Whether the current suit should proceed independently or remain stayed pending the determination of JR Cause No 2 of 2017.
  2. 2 Whether the doctrine of sub-judice applies to bar the continuation of this suit.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the issues in the present suit are substantially the same as those in JR Cause No 2 of 2017, which is still pending. The doctrine of sub-judice precludes the court from proceeding with this matter while the other suit is unresolved. The previous stay order issued on May 8, 2018, remains in force as it has not been altered or discharged. The separation of files does not affect the applicability of the sub-judice doctrine or the validity of the stay order. Therefore, the court directed that this suit be mentioned alongside JR Cause No 2 of 2017 to confirm compliance with the existing orders.

Court Disposition

Suit to remain stayed; to be mentioned alongside JR Cause No 2 of 2017.

Orders

  • The orders issued on May 8, 2018, staying proceedings in this suit, remain in force.
  • This suit shall be mentioned alongside JR Cause No 2 of 2017.