[2014] KEHC 3629 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendant fraudulently registered himself as owner of the suit land. The evidence was uncontroverted, as the defendant failed to appear or defend the suit. The transfer documents relied upon by the defendant contained a false...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 3629 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Kariuki Gatumu; Defendant: Michael Munene Njogu
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kerugoya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 623 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Land and Property Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof; Interlocutory Judgment Previously Entered Due to Non Appearance
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff as prayed in the plaint.
- Judges
- BN Olao
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Land Registration, Ownership Disputes, Land Title Rectification
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kariuki Gatumu
Plaintiff
Michael Munene Njogu
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Land and Property Suit / Judgment After Formal Proof; Interlocutory Judgment Previously Entered Due to Non Appearance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the registration of the suit land in the defendant's name was fraudulent and illegal.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to rectification of the land register to restore his name as owner.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff had established, on a balance of probabilities, that the defendant fraudulently registered himself as owner of the suit land. The evidence was uncontroverted, as the defendant failed to appear or defend the suit. The transfer documents relied upon by the defendant contained a false identity card number, which did not belong to the plaintiff, indicating fraud and collusion at the Lands Registry. The court was satisfied that the plaintiff was the rightful owner and that the registration in the defendant's name was null and void. Accordingly, judgment was entered for the plaintiff as prayed, including rectification of the register to restore the plaintiff...
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff as prayed in the plaint.
Orders
- A declaration that the registration of L.R NGANDORI/KANGARU/PLOT T.13 in the name of the defendant is null and void.
- The suit land to revert to the plaintiff's name in the land register.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA
ELC SUIT NO. 623 OF 2013
KARIUKI GATUMU …………………………………………..…………………..………………. PLAINTIFF
VERSUS
MICHAEL MUNENE NJOGU ………………………………….……….………………….. DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
By his plaint filed herein on 3rd July 2013, the plaintiff suing as the registered owner of a parcel of land known as L.R NGANDORI/KANGARU/PLOT T.13 (hereinafter the suit land) filed this suit against the defendant seeking a declaration that the registration of the said suit land in the names of the defendant is null and void and the same should revert back into the plaintiff’s names. The plaintiff also sought the costs of this suit.
The suit was premised on the pleadings that whereas the plaintiff has always been the registered owner of the suit land, he discovered that infact the defendant had on or about 19th November 1974 fraudulently and illegally caused the said land to be registered in his names without the knowledge or consent of the plaintiff. Particulars of fraud were pleaded.
According to the record, the defendant was duly served with the plaint but did not enter any appearance. Accordingly, on 26th September 2013,interlocutory judgment was entered against him and the matter came up before me for formal proof on 10th July 2014.
In his evidence in chief, the plaintiff testified that he has always been the registered owner of the suit land and produced the Green Cards (Exhibit 1). The said land has been in the possession of DOMINIC MUGO NJERU (PW2) whom he has allowed to grow nappier grass thereon. However, sometime in 2011, PW2 saw some people on the land claiming to have bought the land from one MUNENE. PW2 informed the plaintiff who commenced investigations and went to the Lands office where he found documents showing that he had transferred the land to the defendant. One of the documents was a transfer form (Exhibit 3) showing his Identity Card as No. 9177021/61-0 yet his Identity Card is No. 3521468 (Exhibit 2). He therefore placed a caution on the land and filed this suit.
DOMINIC MUGO NJERU (PW2) confirmed that he knows the plaintiff as the owner of the suit land which he has leased to grow nappier grass and sometime in 2011, some people went there claiming to have bought it from the plaintiff and so he informed the plaintiff.
I have considered the plaintiff’s evidence as supported by his witness. The same is not controverted as the defendant did not file appearance or any defence. It is clear from the plaintiff’s evidence that the defendant must have fraudulently registered himself as the owner of the suit land. This is because, the Identity Card number appearing on the transfer documents does not even belong to the plaintiff. There was clearly collusion between the defendant and un-known person or persons at the Lands Registry. Believing the plaintiff and his witness as I do, I have no reason to find otherwise than that he has established his case as required in law.
Accordingly, therefore, I enter judgment for the plaintiff as prayed in his plaint.
B.N. OLAO
JUDGE
18TH JULY, 2014
18/7/2014
Before
B.N. Olao – Judge
Mwangi – CC
Mr. Kamiru for Muthoni for Plaintiff – present
No appearance for Defendant
COURT:
Judgment delivered in open Court this 18th day of July 2014.
Mr. Kamiru for Ms Muthoni for Plaintiff present
Defendant absent
Right of appeal explained.
B.N. OLAO
JUDGE
18TH JULY, 2014