[2025] KEHC 4517 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 4517 (KLR)

The High Court cannot proceed to determine the application for review in the absence of the complete lower court file, as this would prejudice the fair and just resolution of the issues raised. The judge reiterates the need for the physical lower court file to be supplied as soon as possible before a substantive...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 4517 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Sarah Wangari Kariuki; Respondent: Peter Macharia Gaturu
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E066 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Application for Review; Awaiting Lower Court File for Substantive Determination
Outcome
Ruling deferred pending supply of the physical lower court file; clarification issued on throw away costs.
Judges
LP Kassan
Legal Topics
Review of Judgment, Appeal Process, Court Records, Throw Away Costs
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Review of Judgment Appeal Process Court Records Throw Away Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sarah Wangari Kariuki

Applicant

Peter Macharia Gaturu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Ruling on Application for Review; Awaiting Lower Court File for Substantive Determination

  1. 1 Whether the High Court can proceed to determine the application for review without the complete lower court file.
  2. 2 Clarification of the amount awarded as throw away costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court cannot proceed to determine the application for review in the absence of the complete lower court file, as this would prejudice the fair and just resolution of the issues raised. The judge reiterates the need for the physical lower court file to be supplied as soon as possible before a substantive ruling can be made. Additionally, the court clarifies that the throw away costs awarded were KES 10,000 and not KES 15,000, as previously misunderstood. The matter is set for mention to confirm compliance and availability of the lower court file.

Court Disposition

Ruling deferred pending supply of the physical lower court file; clarification issued on throw away costs.

Orders

  • The physical lower court file shall be supplied as soon as possible for the court to write the ruling on review.
  • Clarification: throw away costs awarded are KES 10,000 and not KES 15,000.