[2022] KEELC 13554 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate he would suffer irreparable loss not compensable by damages, as required for the grant of an interlocutory injunction. The delay of approximately three years in bringing the suit was not explained, undermining the urgency and necessity of injunctive relief....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 13554 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: David Ng’ang’a Kariuki; Defendant: Patrick Mukora; Defendant: Rose Wanjiru Mbugua; Defendant: Inter Active World Limited; Defendant: Land Registrar, Kajiado North District
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment and Land Case Civil Suit E061 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
- Outcome
- Application for injunction dismissed; order for provision of certified copies of green cards granted.
- Judges
- MN Gicheru
- Legal Topics
- Injunctive Relief, Land Ownership Disputes, Trespass, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Ng’ang’a Kariuki
Plaintiff
Patrick Mukora
Defendant
Rose Wanjiru Mbugua
Defendant
Inter Active World Limited
Defendant
Land Registrar, Kajiado North District
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Ruling on Interlocutory Injunction Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case with a probability of success for grant of a temporary injunction.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff stands to suffer irreparable loss that cannot be adequately compensated by damages if the injunction is not granted.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to certified copies of green cards for the suit parcels.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate he would suffer irreparable loss not compensable by damages, as required for the grant of an interlocutory injunction. The delay of approximately three years in bringing the suit was not explained, undermining the urgency and necessity of injunctive relief. The court also held that it was premature to determine whether a prima facie case had been established, as pleadings could still be amended and further evidence adduced. Consequently, the application for injunction lacked merit and was dismissed. However, the court recognized the plaintiff’s statutory and constitutional right to access certified copies of the green cards for the...
Court Disposition
Application for injunction dismissed; order for provision of certified copies of green cards granted.
Orders
- The notice of motion dated 30th September, 2021 is dismissed except as regards the prayer for certified copies of green cards, which is allowed.
- The Land Registrar, Kajiado North District, is ordered to avail certified copies of green cards for Ngong/Ngong/928, 1216, and 1663 to the plaintiff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
26 paragraphs
Kariuki v Mukora & 3 others (Environment and Land Case Civil Suit E061 of 2021) [2022] KEELC 13554 (KLR) (17 October 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELC 13554 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kajiado
Environment and Land Case Civil Suit E061 of 2021
M N Gicheru, J
October 17, 2022
Between
David Ng’ang’a Kariuki
Plaintiff
and
Patrick Mukora
1st Defendant
Rose Wanjiru Mbugua
2nd Defendant
Inter Active World Limited
3rd Defendant
Land Registrar, Kajiado North District
4th Defendant
Ruling
1. This ruling is on the Notice of Motion dated 30/9/2021. The said motion which is by the Plaintiff David Ng’ang’a seeks the following orders,(i)That a temporary injunction be issued restraining the first, second and third Defendants being Patrick Mukora, Rose Wanjiru Mbugua, and Inter Active World Limited, their agents, servants, workers, employees or anybody working under their instructions from trespassing, entering, constructing, cultivating, wasting, or in any way interfering with the Applicant’s ownership rights on land parcels Ngong/Ngong/928, 1216 and 1663 pending the hearing and determination of this suit.(ii)That the fourth Defendant, Land Registrar Kajiado North District be ordered to avail certified copies of green cards for the three land parcels above mentioned.(iii)That the OCS Ngong Police Station be authorized to ensure that peace prevails during the enforcement of the orders of this court.(iv)That the costs of this application be paid by the Respondent.
2. The motion is supported by an affidavit sworn by the Applicant dated 30/9/2021 in which he states as follows.He is the registered owner of the three parcels which he inherited from his father the late Francis Kariuki Kuria. He lived peacefully on the suit land until the year 2018 when the three Defendants trespassed therein.They have persisted in the illegal occupation and only an order of injunction would save his land from the Defendants’ illegal occupation.
3. In further support of the motion, the Applicant has filed the following documents namely, copies of title deeds for the three parcels, copy of certificate of death of the late Simon Kariuki Kuria and copies of sketch maps for the area in which the suit and is situated.
4. The application by the Plaintiff is opposed by the second Defendant, Rose Wanjiru Mbugua, who has sworn a replying affidavit dated 11th February, 2022 in which she deposes that she has not trespassed on land reference Ngong/Ngong/928, 1216 or 1663 because she occupies L.R. Ngong/Ngong/32156 and she has no interest whatsoever in the Plaintiff’s land parcels. She prays that the Applicant’s application be dismissed.
5. I have carefully considered the application in its entirety including the affidavits and annexures. I have also considered the prerequisites to the grant of an order of injunction as per the case of Giella –versus-Cassman Brown (1973) EA 358 namely prima facie case with a probability of success and irreparable loss that cannot be adequately compensated by an award of damages.If the court is not sure of the above two, then it looks at the balance of convenience.I find that it is too early to determine if the Applicant has established a prima facie case with a probability of success because he could still amend his pleadings and even adduce more evidence.On the second limb, I find that the Applicant has not proved that he stands to suffer irreparable loss that cannot be adequately compensated by an award of damages. He has not explained why it took him about three years from 2018 to file this suit.Having found against the Applicant on the second limb of the prerequisites to the grant of an order of injunction, I need not consider the third prerequisite.For the above reasons, I dismiss the application for injunction as I find that it has not merit.I hasten to add that the prayer for availing of the certified copies of green cards for the three (3 parcels) is well deserved for the following reasons.Firstly, under Section 9 of the Land Registration Act (Act No. 3 of2012), it is the duty of fourth Defendant to maintain the register and any document required to be kept under the Act in a secure, accessible and reliable format.Secondly, under Article 35 of the Constitution of Kenya, every citizen has the right of access to information held by the state.The Plaintiff is therefore entitled to copies of the green cards for the suit parcels as a matter of right.The notice of motion dated 30th September, 2021 is therefore dismissed in all respects except as regards prayer 4 which is allowed.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT KAJIADO THIS 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022. M.N. GICHERUJUDGE............................................