[2025] KEHC 1842 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 1842 (KLR)

The court found that the mediated agreement dated 25th April 2024 was binding and contained a default clause. No exceptional circumstances were demonstrated by the applicant to justify varying the agreement. The applicant had not made any payment to show good faith, and the attempt to unilaterally vary the agreement...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 1842 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Hon Sicily K. Kariuki; Respondent: The Standard Group Limited; Respondent: Orlandu Lyomu; Respondent: Jesse Rogers
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case E190 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Vary Mediated Agreement
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
LP Kassan
Legal Topics
Mediation Agreements, Variation of Consents, Enforcement of Settlement, Contractual Obligations
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Mediation Agreements Variation of Consents Enforcement of Settlement Contractual Obligations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hon Sicily K. Kariuki

Applicant

The Standard Group Limited

Respondent

Orlandu Lyomu

Respondent

Jesse Rogers

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Vary Mediated Agreement

  1. 1 Whether the court should vary the mediated agreement to allow payment of Kshs 1,500,000 in four instalments.
  2. 2 Whether there are exceptional circumstances justifying interference with the mediation agreement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the mediated agreement dated 25th April 2024 was binding and contained a default clause. No exceptional circumstances were demonstrated by the applicant to justify varying the agreement. The applicant had not made any payment to show good faith, and the attempt to unilaterally vary the agreement was not supported by law or equity. The court held that it would be unfair to adjust what was mutually agreed by the parties, and thus dismissed the application with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application to vary the mediated agreement is dismissed with costs to the respondents.