[2012] KEHC 3266 (KLR)
The court found that the statutory period for confirmation of grant had lapsed and, in the absence of a formal objection, the grant ought to be confirmed. However, the court recognized the objector's right to file a formal objection and to apply for maintenance from the estate due to ill health. The court directed...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 3266 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Karmij Kaur Rehal; Respondent: Amardeep Singh Rehal
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 768 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Directions on Objection/maintenance Application
- Outcome
- Grant confirmed; objector permitted to file formal objection and application for maintenance.
- Judges
- HK Chemitei
- Legal Topics
- Confirmation of Grant, Estate Administration, Maintenance of Dependants
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Karmij Kaur Rehal
Applicant
Amardeep Singh Rehal
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Confirmation of Grant and Directions on Objection/maintenance Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the grant of representation should be confirmed after the statutory period has lapsed.
- 2 Whether the objector is entitled to file a formal objection to the confirmation of the grant.
- 3 Whether the objector can apply for upkeep and maintenance from the estate due to ill health.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the statutory period for confirmation of grant had lapsed and, in the absence of a formal objection, the grant ought to be confirmed. However, the court recognized the objector's right to file a formal objection and to apply for maintenance from the estate due to ill health. The court directed that the objector may proceed with these applications, and the executor will have an opportunity to respond. The confirmation of the grant does not preclude the objector from seeking relief through the proper legal channels.
Court Disposition
Grant confirmed; objector permitted to file formal objection and application for maintenance.
Orders
- The grant of representation is confirmed.
- The objector, Amardeep Singh Rehal, is at liberty to file a formal objection to the confirmation of the grant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISUMU
SUCCESSION CAUSE 768 OF 2009
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF HARVINDER SINGH REHAL(DECEASED)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICTAION BY: KARMIJ KAUR REHAL....................….PETITIONER
RULING
When this matter came up for hearing on 21st June 2012 the parties made several off record submissions or presentation on issues relating to this cause.
I have read the pleadings herein and it is my considered opinion that the grant ought to be confirmed. Six months have since expired. The objector Amardeep Singh Rehal can go ahead and file his formal objection to the grant being confirmed to the executor.
Further the objector can go ahead to formally make an applicant for his upkeep and maintenance from the estate especially in respect to his ill health where the executor can respond if need be.
Dated, signed and delivered at Kisumu this 29th of June 2012
H. K. CHEMITEI
JUDGE
In the presence of:
Ashimosi Advocate for Petitioner
S. M. Onyango Advocate for object
HKC/aao