[2023] KEELRC 1920 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1920 (KLR)

The court held that the cause of action arose on February 4, 2020, when the claimant was summarily dismissed. Any internal appeal or dispute resolution mechanism pursued after the termination did not extend or suspend the statutory limitation period under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007. The claim was filed...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1920 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Daniel Mburu Karuma; Respondent: Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E023 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Limitation Period and Jurisdiction
Outcome
claim dismissed for want of jurisdiction due to limitation period
Judges
M Mbarũ
Legal Topics
Limitation Periods, Summary Dismissal, Jurisdiction of Court, Employment Contracts
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Limitation Periods Summary Dismissal Jurisdiction of Court Employment Contracts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Mburu Karuma

Applicant

Kenya Power & Lighting Co. Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Limitation Period and Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the claim is time-barred under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent can rely on the Public Authorities Limitations Act to bar the claim.
  3. 3 Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear a claim filed outside the statutory limitation period.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the cause of action arose on February 4, 2020, when the claimant was summarily dismissed. Any internal appeal or dispute resolution mechanism pursued after the termination did not extend or suspend the statutory limitation period under Section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007. The claim was filed on March 23, 2023, which was beyond the three-year limitation period. The limitation period for employment claims is strict and cannot be extended for contractual claims. The respondent, being a company, could not rely on the Public Authorities Limitations Act, but this did not affect the outcome since the Employment Act's limitation period applied. As the claim was filed out of...

Court Disposition

claim dismissed for want of jurisdiction due to limitation period

Orders

  • The claim is dismissed with costs to the respondent.