[2017] KEELC 1922 (KLR)

[2017] KEELC 1922 (KLR)

The court held that the plaintiffs failed to disclose any registered or equitable interest in a specific, identifiable parcel of land. The description provided was vague and did not relate to any particular parcel, making it impossible for the court to grant a temporary injunction. Upholding the defendants'...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELC 1922 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kasarani Young Generation Group (suing through its officials James Mburu Nuthu, Tabitha Thuranira, Julia Ayoti Alphayo); Defendant: Sports Stadia Management Board; Defendant: Gabriel Komora; Defendant: Sports Kenya
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 322 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application for Temporary Injunction
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the defendants
Judges
MM Gitumbi
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Preliminary Objection, Land Identification, Equitable Interest, Registered Interest
Source Language
en
Land and Property Temporary Injunctions Preliminary Objection Land Identification Equitable Interest Registered Interest

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kasarani Young Generation Group (suing through its officials James Mburu Nuthu, Tabitha Thuranira, Julia Ayoti Alphayo)

Plaintiff

Sports Stadia Management Board

Defendant

Gabriel Komora

Defendant

Sports Kenya

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Application for Temporary Injunction

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs have disclosed any registered or equitable interest in a specific, identifiable parcel of land.
  2. 2 Whether a temporary injunction can be granted in the absence of a claim to a particular parcel of land.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the plaintiffs failed to disclose any registered or equitable interest in a specific, identifiable parcel of land. The description provided was vague and did not relate to any particular parcel, making it impossible for the court to grant a temporary injunction. Upholding the defendants' preliminary objection, the court found that without a clear claim to a defined property, the plaintiffs lacked the requisite standing to seek injunctive relief. The application was therefore dismissed with costs to the defendants.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the defendants

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 23rd April, 2015 is dismissed.
  • Costs awarded to the defendants.