[2024] KEELC 13743 (KLR)
The court determined that, due to the revocation of the grant of letters of administration previously held by the respondents and the pending appeal regarding the rightful administrators, it would be improper to proceed with the substantive hearing of the originating summons or related matters. The court emphasized...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEELC 13743 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Jemima Katheu Kaseme & others; Respondent: Ramadhan Iddi Ramadhan & others
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E007 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Summons / Interlocutory Ruling on Status Quo and Case Management
- Outcome
- Status quo orders maintained; proceedings stayed pending appointment of proper administrators.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Succession Disputes, Status Quo Orders, Joinder of Parties
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jemima Katheu Kaseme & others
Applicant
Ramadhan Iddi Ramadhan & others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Summons / Interlocutory Ruling on Status Quo and Case Management
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to be declared proprietors of parcel no 39-Ganda by way of adverse possession.
- 2 Whether the proceedings can continue in light of the revocation of the grant of letters of administration to the respondents.
- 3 Whether status quo orders should be maintained pending appointment of proper administrators.
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that, due to the revocation of the grant of letters of administration previously held by the respondents and the pending appeal regarding the rightful administrators, it would be improper to proceed with the substantive hearing of the originating summons or related matters. The court emphasized the necessity of having proper parties with locus standi to represent the estate of the deceased. In order to preserve the subject matter and prevent prejudice to any party, the court ordered that the status quo be maintained in all related suits concerning parcel no 39-Ganda until the appointment of proper administrators. The court further directed that all related files be...
Court Disposition
Status quo orders maintained; proceedings stayed pending appointment of proper administrators.
Orders
- Status quo orders in all related suits concerning parcel no 39-Ganda to be observed as previously ordered.
- No substantive hearings to proceed until proper administrators of the deceased are appointed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
Kaseme & others v Ramadhan & others (Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E007 of 2021) [2024] KEELC 13743 (KLR) (11 December 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEELC 13743 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Enviromental and Land Originating Summons E007 of 2021
FM Njoroge, J
December 11, 2024
Between
Jemima Katheu Kaseme & others
Applicant
and
Ramadhan Iddi Ramadhan & others
Respondent
Ruling
1. Vide an Originating summons dated 8/8/2019 filed in ELC OS 65 of 2019, the applicants therein approached this court, suing 5 respondents, seeking to be declared the proprietors of parcel no 39-Ganda by way of adverse possession. Withdrawal was made of the suit against the then 2nd respondent as he was deceased. Vide a notice of withdrawal dated 18/1/2021 numerous applicants withdrew their claims entirely against all the respondents. a motion for injunctive orders was filed on 18/2/2020. A preliminary objection dated 20/8/2020 was filed. An amended originating summons was filed on 2/6/2021. A motion for joinder of interested parties was filed on 2/11/2021. On 10/7/23 status quo orders were issued pending hearing and determination of the originating summons. A further amended Originating summons was filed on 3/8/2023. Meanwhile in a Mombasa Succession Cause No. 94 Of 2011, the grant that had been issued to the 1st and 2nd respondents was revoked on 10/6/2024 when the 1st and 2nd respondents admitted that they were not children of the former owner of the land or his lineage but descendants of the deceased’s slaves. I note that this file (ELC 65/2019) has been informally acting as the lead file in a perceived consolidation of several related suits, but I can not locate the consolidation order in the pseudo-lead file or in the other files. Upon intimation that the files could be consolidated, the court only ordered that they be brought up for mention on 6/12/2021, but on that day the court only dealt with a joinder motion filed under certificate of urgency. The issue of whether the case can proceed while the grant has been revoked and no substantive final determination on appeal regarding the rightful grant holders (the court has been made to understand in OS No 6/24 that an appeal has been lodged against the revocation and the revocation has been stayed) is also a thorny issue, for who would then defend the case?
2. In view of the foregoing this court directs that status quo orders in all the related suits be observed as earlier ordered by this court until the proper administrators of the deceased have been appointed and thereafter the hearings can take off in all the related matters. These directions shall apply to all the related files in which parcel no 39 is the subject matter as follows: ELC OS No 6 of 2023, ELC No 251 of 2017, ELC Land Case No 65 of 2019 O.S, ELC OS no 15 of 2022, ELC OS 72 of 2019, and ELC OS 6 of 2021. These files shall be listed for mention on 20/3/2025 to ascertain the position with regard to the succession issue.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MALINDI VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL ON THIS 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024. MWANGI NJOROGEJUDGE, ELC, MALINDI