[2020] KEHC 4608 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 4608 (KLR)

The court found that the trial magistrate failed to consider the appellants' guilty pleas, their status as first offenders, and their mitigation, including the humanitarian circumstances that led them to enter Kenya. The sentencing guidelines require that such factors be taken into account, and a measure of credit...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 4608 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kasereka Kanyama Adolphe; Appellant: Abdu Rashid Ssekajigo; Appellant: Shadrack Jacob; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Garissa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Appeal 28, 29 & 30 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence
Outcome
sentences reduced; repatriation ordered
Judges
CM Kariuki
Legal Topics
Immigration Offences, Sentencing Guidelines, Mitigation, Plea of Guilty
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Immigration Offences Sentencing Guidelines Mitigation Plea of Guilty

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kasereka Kanyama Adolphe

Appellant

Abdu Rashid Ssekajigo

Appellant

Shadrack Jacob

Appellant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentences imposed on the appellants were excessive in light of their guilty pleas and mitigating circumstances.
  2. 2 Whether the trial court failed to consider sentencing guidelines and mitigation in passing sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the trial magistrate failed to consider the appellants' guilty pleas, their status as first offenders, and their mitigation, including the humanitarian circumstances that led them to enter Kenya. The sentencing guidelines require that such factors be taken into account, and a measure of credit should be given for a guilty plea and time already served. The original sentences, though within statutory limits, were excessive in the circumstances. The court therefore reduced the fines and custodial sentences for both counts, ordering that the sentences run consecutively, and directed that the appellants be repatriated after serving their sentences or payment of fines.

Court Disposition

sentences reduced; repatriation ordered

Orders

  • On count II, the fine is reduced to Ksh. 100,000 or a sentence of 1 year imprisonment.
  • On count III, the fine is reduced to Ksh. 200,000 or a sentence of 2 years imprisonment, to run consecutively.