https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3554

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3554

Although the court accepted that the dispute had been settled by consent and that the restriction may no longer be justified, section 78(2) of the Land Registration Act required notice to the Land Registrar before the court could order removal of the restriction. Because there was no evidence that the Land...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELC 3554 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff/applicant: Nicelate Mutitu Kathuri (As the legal representative of the Estate of Njeru Simon Gathuri - Deceased); Defendant/respondent: Cyrus Njeru Ireri; Interested Party: Silas Murithi Kathuri & 8 others
Court
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Case 67 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case; Application for Removal of Restrictions on Land Parcels / Ruling on Notice of Motion Dated 11/09/2025
Outcome
Application struck out
Judges
["EC Cherono"]
Legal Topics
Removal of Restriction, Notice to Registrar, Consent Withdrawal of Dispute, Land Registration Act Section 78
Source Language
en
Land Law Civil Procedure Removal of Restriction Notice to Registrar Consent Withdrawal of Dispute Land Registration Act Section 78

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nicelate Mutitu Kathuri (As the legal representative of the Estate of Njeru Simon Gathuri - Deceased)

Plaintiff/applicant

Cyrus Njeru Ireri

Defendant/respondent

Silas Murithi Kathuri & 8 others

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case; Application for Removal of Restrictions on Land Parcels / Ruling on Notice of Motion Dated 11/09/2025

  1. 1 Whether the restrictions on land parcels Gaturi/Nembure/16095, 16096, 16097, 16098 and 16099 should be removed
  2. 2 Whether the court could order removal of the restrictions without evidence that the Land Registrar had been served with the application

Ratio Decidendi

Although the court accepted that the dispute had been settled by consent and that the restriction may no longer be justified, section 78(2) of the Land Registration Act required notice to the Land Registrar before the court could order removal of the restriction. Because there was no evidence that the Land Registrar, Embu, had been served, the application could not be granted and had to be struck out.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • Applicant to serve the Land Registrar, Embu, with the application first.
  • Application struck out with no orders as to costs.