[2013] KEHC 4433 (KLR)

[2013] KEHC 4433 (KLR)

The court, having considered the Notice of Motion filed by the applicant on 19th September, 2012, found that sufficient grounds had been established to warrant granting leave to the applicant to sue the 1st to 4th defendants. The court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicant and granted the leave as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] KEHC 4433 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Katuti Kisaa Katoni; Respondent: Joseph K. Muema; Respondent: Kimeu Manyele Kiala; Respondent: Stephen Nyamai Muema; Respondent: Muasa Manyele Kiala; Respondent: The Land Registrar Kwale District
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Mombasa
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 11 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave to Sue
Outcome
Leave granted to the applicant to sue the 1st to 4th defendants as prayed. No order as to costs.
Judges
JV Juma
Legal Topics
Leave to Sue, Joinder of Parties, Land Disputes
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Leave to Sue Joinder of Parties Land Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Katuti Kisaa Katoni

Applicant

Joseph K. Muema

Respondent

Kimeu Manyele Kiala

Respondent

Stephen Nyamai Muema

Respondent

Muasa Manyele Kiala

Respondent

The Land Registrar Kwale District

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Leave to Sue

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to sue the 1st to 4th defendants.
  2. 2 Whether any order as to costs should be made at this stage.

Ratio Decidendi

The court, having considered the Notice of Motion filed by the applicant on 19th September, 2012, found that sufficient grounds had been established to warrant granting leave to the applicant to sue the 1st to 4th defendants. The court exercised its discretion in favour of the applicant and granted the leave as prayed. The court further determined that no order as to costs would be made at this stage, reflecting the preliminary nature of the application and the absence of opposition from the respondents.

Court Disposition

Leave granted to the applicant to sue the 1st to 4th defendants as prayed. No order as to costs.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to sue the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th defendants as prayed in the Notice of Motion filed on 19th September, 2012.
  • No order as to costs.