[2025] KECPT 286 (KLR)

[2025] KECPT 286 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had provided credible documentary evidence of deposits, while the Respondent's defence was limited to denials and reference to an ongoing inquiry without substantive rebuttal. The Tribunal was persuaded by the Claimant's evidence and, in the absence of contrary proof from the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KECPT 286 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Felix Muthengi Kavita; Respondent: Metropolitan National Sacco limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 773/E1043 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Case / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the applicant
Judges
BM Kimemia, Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Sacco Deposits, Account Statement Disputes, Member Rights, Monetary Claims
Source Language
en
Banking and Finance Sacco Deposits Account Statement Disputes Member Rights Monetary Claims

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Felix Muthengi Kavita

Applicant

Metropolitan National Sacco limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Case / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to the sum of Kshs. 282,000 as pleaded against the Respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent provided sufficient evidence to rebut the Claimant's claim for deposits.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the Claimant had provided credible documentary evidence of deposits, while the Respondent's defence was limited to denials and reference to an ongoing inquiry without substantive rebuttal. The Tribunal was persuaded by the Claimant's evidence and, in the absence of contrary proof from the Respondent, entered judgment in favour of the Claimant for the sum claimed, together with costs and interest.

Court Disposition

judgment for the applicant

Orders

  • Judgment entered in favour of the Claimant against the Respondent for Kshs. 282,000 as pleaded.
  • Respondent to pay costs of the suit.