[2016] KEELC 1043 (KLR)

[2016] KEELC 1043 (KLR)

The court found that by the time the suit was filed and the injunctive order was issued on 5th September 2014, plot number C10840 Malindi had already been subdivided in 2009 and transferred to the Defendant's siblings in 2011. The Defendant was not the registered owner at the material time, and the suit property as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEELC 1043 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kazungu Fondo Shutu; Applicant: Habel Kahindi Charo; Respondent: Japhet Noti Charo
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 172 of 2013
Procedural Posture
Contempt Application / Ruling on Contempt Application
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Contempt of Court, Injunctive Orders, Land Ownership Disputes, Subdivision of Land
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Contempt of Court Injunctive Orders Land Ownership Disputes Subdivision of Land

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kazungu Fondo Shutu

Applicant

Habel Kahindi Charo

Applicant

Japhet Noti Charo

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Contempt Application / Ruling on Contempt Application

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant disobeyed the court order restraining alienation, transfer, or charging of plot number C10840 Malindi.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant can be held in contempt when the suit property had already been subdivided and transferred before the issuance of the court order.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiffs' failure to conduct an official search affects the validity of their contempt application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that by the time the suit was filed and the injunctive order was issued on 5th September 2014, plot number C10840 Malindi had already been subdivided in 2009 and transferred to the Defendant's siblings in 2011. The Defendant was not the registered owner at the material time, and the suit property as described no longer existed. The Plaintiffs failed to conduct an official search to ascertain the correct status and ownership of the land before filing suit and seeking injunctive relief. As a result, the Defendant could not be held in contempt for actions relating to property he did not own or control at the time of the order. The application for contempt was therefore...

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The Plaintiffs' Application dated 12th May 2015 is dismissed with costs.