https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/9492

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/9492

The court found the delay in lodging the charge at the Companies Registry was sufficiently explained, there was no evidence of bad faith or prejudice to creditors or third parties, and the chargor did not oppose the application. It therefore exercised its discretion under section 888 of the Companies Act to extend...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 9492 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: KCB Bank Kenya Limited
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E739 of 2026
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time for Registration of Charge
Outcome
Application allowed
Judges
["MO Ado"]
Legal Topics
Extension of Time for Registration of Charge, Registration of Charge at Companies Registry, Perfection of Security Interest, Discretion of Court Under Section 888 of the Companies Act, Ex Parte Application
Source Language
en
Commercial Law Company Law Banking Law Land Law Extension of Time for Registration of Charge Registration of Charge at Companies Registry Perfection of Security Interest Discretion of Court Under Section 888 of the Companies Act +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

KCB Bank Kenya Limited

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Extension of Time for Registration of Charge

  1. 1 Whether the court should extend time for registration of the charge at the Companies Registry under section 888 of the Companies Act, 2015
  2. 2 Whether the delay in registration was accidental, due to inadvertence, or otherwise sufficiently explained
  3. 3 Whether any prejudice would be caused to creditors, members, or third parties if the extension were granted

Ratio Decidendi

The court found the delay in lodging the charge at the Companies Registry was sufficiently explained, there was no evidence of bad faith or prejudice to creditors or third parties, and the chargor did not oppose the application. It therefore exercised its discretion under section 888 of the Companies Act to extend time and direct registration of the charge.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 24th June 2026 was allowed.
  • Time for registration at the Companies Registry of the Charge dated 18th May 2026 over Title Numbers Nakuru Municipality Block 21/802 and Nakuru Municipality Block 21/802 in favour of KCB Bank Kenya Limited was extended.