[2014] KEELC 511 (KLR)
The court held that it has jurisdiction to determine whether the respondents, as Kenyan entities, have violated the petitioner's constitutional rights in relation to agreements or arrangements with Ethiopia for the purchase of electricity. The court found that while there is a likelihood of adverse environmental impact from the Gibe III project on Lake Turkana and its dependent communities, there was no concrete evidence of actual harm or infringement of rights at the time of judgment. However, the court determined that the respondents and interested party, as trustees of the environment and natural resources, have a constitutional and statutory duty to ensure sustainable management of...
- Citation
- [2014] KEELC 511 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Friends of Lake Turkana Trust; Respondent: The Honorable Attorney General (on behalf of the Government of Kenya); Respondent: Kenya Power & Lighting Company Limited; Interested Party: Kenya Electricity Transmission Company Limited
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2014
- Case Number
- ? 825 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Right to Information, Public Trust Doctrine, Environmental Impact Assessment, Transboundary Environmental Harm, Sustainable Development, Access to Justice
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Friends of Lake Turkana Trust
Applicant
The Honorable Attorney General (on behalf of the Government of Kenya)
Respondent
Kenya Power & Lighting Company Limited
Respondent
Kenya Electricity Transmission Company Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to address constitutional issues arising from agreements between the Kenyan and Ethiopian governments for the purchase of electricity.
- 2 Whether the fundamental rights and freedoms of the petitioner and affected communities have been violated by the respondents' actions or omissions.
- 3 Whether the respondents and interested party have fulfilled their constitutional and statutory obligations regarding environmental protection, public participation, and information disclosure.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that it has jurisdiction to determine whether the respondents, as Kenyan entities, have violated the petitioner's constitutional rights in relation to agreements or arrangements with Ethiopia for the purchase of electricity. The court found that while there is a likelihood of adverse environmental impact from the Gibe III project on Lake Turkana and its dependent communities, there was no concrete evidence of actual harm or infringement of rights at the time of judgment. However, the court determined that the respondents and interested party, as trustees of the environment and natural resources, have a constitutional and statutory duty to ensure sustainable management of...
Court Disposition
Petition allowed in part.
Orders
- Order of mandamus compelling the Government of Kenya, Kenya Power and Lighting Company Limited, and Kenya Electricity Transmission Company Limited to make full and complete disclosure to the petitioner of all agreements or arrangements with the Government of Ethiopia relating to the proposed purchase of electricity,...
- Direction to the Government of Kenya, Kenya Power and Lighting Company Limited, and Kenya Electricity Transmission Company Limited to take necessary steps to ensure sustainable management, utilization, and conservation of Lake Turkana's natural resources in any engagement or agreement with Ethiopia relating to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment