[2022] KEELC 771 (KLR)
The Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to determine preliminary objections based on state/sovereign immunity when raised in environmental petitions. The Defence Cooperation Agreement between Kenya and the UK provides that Kenya has jurisdiction over civil claims arising from activities in its territory, including environmental harm allegedly caused by BATUK. However, the Agreement establishes a mandatory dispute resolution mechanism through the Inter-Governmental Liaison Committee, which must be exhausted before the court can entertain the petition. The court found that both the UK and Kenyan governments waived immunity to the extent stipulated in the Agreement, but the...
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 771 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: African Centre for Corrective and Preventive Action; Respondent: Lolldaiga Hills Limited; Respondent: British Army Training Unit in Kenya (BATUK); Respondent: Commanding Officer, BATUK; Interested Party: Kenya Wildlife Service; Interested Party: Kenya Forest Service; Applicant: 2nd to 7th Petitioners (Residents of Lolldaiga)
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Nanyuki
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2022
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Petition 2 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Stay Application
- Outcome
- Petition stayed; dispute referred to Inter-Governmental Liaison Committee under the Defence Cooperation Agreement.
- Judges
- AK Bor
- Legal Topics
- State Immunity, Environmental Damage, Doctrine of Exhaustion, International Agreements, Jurisdiction of Courts, Compensation for Environmental Harm
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
African Centre for Corrective and Preventive Action
Applicant
Lolldaiga Hills Limited
Respondent
British Army Training Unit in Kenya (BATUK)
Respondent
Commanding Officer, BATUK
Respondent
Kenya Wildlife Service
Interested Party
Kenya Forest Service
Interested Party
2nd to 7th Petitioners (Residents of Lolldaiga)
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection and Stay Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to determine issues on state/sovereign immunity raised in a petition alleging violation of the right to a clean and healthy environment.
- 2 Whether the British Army Training Unit in Kenya (BATUK), its members, employees or agents are liable for the fire on Lolldaiga Hills and protected from civil claims via state/sovereign immunity.
- 3 Whether the petitioners must exhaust the dispute resolution mechanisms in the Defence Cooperation Agreement before approaching the court.
Ratio Decidendi
The Environment and Land Court has jurisdiction to determine preliminary objections based on state/sovereign immunity when raised in environmental petitions. The Defence Cooperation Agreement between Kenya and the UK provides that Kenya has jurisdiction over civil claims arising from activities in its territory, including environmental harm allegedly caused by BATUK. However, the Agreement establishes a mandatory dispute resolution mechanism through the Inter-Governmental Liaison Committee, which must be exhausted before the court can entertain the petition. The court found that both the UK and Kenyan governments waived immunity to the extent stipulated in the Agreement, but the...
Court Disposition
Petition stayed; dispute referred to Inter-Governmental Liaison Committee under the Defence Cooperation Agreement.
Orders
- The dispute is referred to the Inter-Governmental Liaison Committee for resolution through the Ministries of Defence of Kenya and the UK.
- The relevant authorities of Kenya and the UK shall cooperate in investigating the claims and collecting evidence as per article 11 of the Defence Cooperation Agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment