[2002] KEHC 373 (KLR)
The court found that the plea entered by the appellant was not an unequivocal admission of guilt. Although the charge under which the appellant was convicted should have been an alternative charge and not a separate count, this procedural irregularity did not in itself occasion a miscarriage of justice. However, the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KEHC 373 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Keffah Pasut Matoke; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 729 of 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; retrial ordered
- Legal Topics
- Indecent Assault, Plea of Guilty, Miscarriage of Justice, Retrial Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keffah Pasut Matoke
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plea entered by the appellant was an unequivocal admission of guilt.
- 2 Whether the conviction and sentence were proper in light of the plea and the charges as framed.
- 3 Whether a retrial would occasion a miscarriage of justice.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plea entered by the appellant was not an unequivocal admission of guilt. Although the charge under which the appellant was convicted should have been an alternative charge and not a separate count, this procedural irregularity did not in itself occasion a miscarriage of justice. However, the lack of an unequivocal plea rendered the conviction unsafe. The court determined that the interests of justice would be served by quashing the conviction and sentence and ordering a retrial before a different magistrate, as the appellant had only served four months of the sentence and a retrial would not result in a miscarriage of justice.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; retrial ordered
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The conviction is quashed and sentence set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
11 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 729 OF 2002FROM ORIGINAL CONVICTION AND SENTENCE IN CRIMINAL CASE NO 2646 OF 2002 OF THE SP MAGISTRATE’S COURT AT KIBERAKEFFAH PASUT MATOKE………………………………..APPELLANT VERSUS REPUBLIC……………………………………...…………..RESPONDENTJ U D G M E N T
The appellant was convicted of the offence of indecent assault on a female c/s 144(1) (and not section 114(B) of The Penal code and sentenced to five years imprisonment with hard labour and to receive 8 strokes of the cane. The record shows that this was count two of the charge wherein the first count was defilement of a girl c/s 145(1) of The penal code. The appellant allegedly pleaded guilty to the said count two.
Aggrieved by the said conviction, he appealed. The learned counsel for the appellant has taken the court through the record pointing out several discrepancies and submitted that this appeal should succeed.
On the other hand, the learned counsel for the Republic, while conceding the plea was not an unequivocal admission of guilt, submitted that, that alone could not absolve the appellant from the offence charged.
I have gone through the record.First, the offence upon which the appellant was convicted should have been an alternative charge to the main charge, not a separate count. Secondly the section cited should have been 144(1) but that alone did not occasion a miscarriage of justice.
The offences were serious in nature and it would appear the appellant had the inclination to admit the same. I however, with respect, agree that the plea was not an unequivocal admission of the offence.
The appellant has served only four months of the sentence imposed.An order for a retrial will not occasion a miscarriage of justice.
Accordingly, the appeal is allowed, conviction quashed and sentence set aside. The appellant shall appear before another magistrate of competent jurisdiction in Nairobi on 7th October, 2002 for a retrial.
Orders accordingly.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this 1st day of October, 2002MBOGHOLI MSAGHAJUDGE