[2023] KEELC 21193 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 21193 (KLR)

The court found that both parties were not opposed to the grant of stay of execution, with the only issue being the provision of security for costs. The appellants acknowledged the need for security, and the respondent was agreeable to stay on that condition. The court applied Order 42 Rule 6(2) of the Civil...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 21193 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Peter Ndungu Kega; Appellant: Isaac King’Ori Kega; Respondent: Blue Nile (East Africa) Limited
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyeri
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal E032 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Appeal / Stay Application Ruling
Outcome
Conditional stay of execution granted.
Judges
JO Olola
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Costs, Appeals Process, Land Guarantees
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Stay of Execution Security for Costs Appeals Process Land Guarantees

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Ndungu Kega

Appellant

Isaac King’Ori Kega

Appellant

Blue Nile (East Africa) Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Appeal / Stay Application Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the appellants are entitled to an order of stay of execution of the ruling and orders made on 23rd November, 2022 pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether security for costs should be imposed as a condition for stay of execution.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that both parties were not opposed to the grant of stay of execution, with the only issue being the provision of security for costs. The appellants acknowledged the need for security, and the respondent was agreeable to stay on that condition. The court applied Order 42 Rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Rules, which mandates that substantial loss must be shown and security provided. The court noted that the costs awarded to the respondent had been assessed at Kshs. 365,044.96. Consequently, the court granted a conditional stay of execution, requiring the appellants to deposit the assessed sum in a joint interest-earning account in the names of the advocates for both parties...

Court Disposition

Conditional stay of execution granted.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the orders issued on 23rd November, 2022 is granted on condition that the appellants deposit Kshs. 365,044.96 in a joint interest earning account in the names of the advocates for both parties within 30 days.
  • In default, the motion dated 19th December, 2022 shall stand dismissed with costs.