[2013] KEHC 6082 (KLR)
The court held that although Article 22(3)(c) of the Constitution contemplates that no fee may be charged for commencing public interest litigation, the absence of rules by the Chief Justice does not entitle litigants to unilaterally exempt themselves from paying court fees. Instead, a prospective petitioner must apply to the court for exemption from paying fees before filing the substantive petition. The court found that the appropriate procedure is analogous to pauper litigation under Order 33 of the Civil Procedure Rules, where the court considers the nature of the case and the reasons for exemption. The court emphasized that the intended suit must be genuine public interest...
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 6082 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: John Wekesa Khaoya; Defendant: Attorney General
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Bungoma
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2013
- Case Number
- Petition 60 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Application for Exemption From Paying Court Fees in Public Interest Litigation
- Outcome
- Application for exemption from payment of filing fees is granted.
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Litigation, Court Fees Exemption, Access to Justice, Locus Standi
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Wekesa Khaoya
Plaintiff
Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Application for Exemption From Paying Court Fees in Public Interest Litigation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a prospective petitioner should apply for exemption from paying court fees before filing a public interest litigation.
- 2 What is the proper procedure for applying for exemption from court fees in public interest litigation?
- 3 What criteria should the court apply in determining an application for exemption from court fees?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that although Article 22(3)(c) of the Constitution contemplates that no fee may be charged for commencing public interest litigation, the absence of rules by the Chief Justice does not entitle litigants to unilaterally exempt themselves from paying court fees. Instead, a prospective petitioner must apply to the court for exemption from paying fees before filing the substantive petition. The court found that the appropriate procedure is analogous to pauper litigation under Order 33 of the Civil Procedure Rules, where the court considers the nature of the case and the reasons for exemption. The court emphasized that the intended suit must be genuine public interest...
Court Disposition
Application for exemption from payment of filing fees is granted.
Orders
- The petitioner is exempted from payment of filing fee or any further fee on the petition.
- Any fee already paid, unless it is the initial filing fee on the petition, will not be refunded.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment