[2014] KEHC 7526 (KLR)
The court held that withdrawal of Petition 305 of 2012 would have adverse juridical effects on the public interest, as several substantial constitutional issues raised in that petition—such as the right to property, right to a clean and healthy environment, and right to health—were not addressed in Petition 34 of 2013. The court found that Petition 305 of 2012 served as the conceptual foundation for the consolidated proceedings, and its withdrawal would compromise the ability of the parties and the court to fully address the public interest concerns at stake. The court further held that while the consolidated petition could proceed without the individual participation of the original...
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 7526 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Makau Musyoka; Applicant: Elijah Mutua Makanga; Applicant: Jacob Mbya Musyoka; Applicant: Francis Kithome Kitheka; Applicant: Andrew Kasee Mwinzi; Applicant: Nicholas Munywoki Mwasa; Applicant: Eric Mutua; Applicant: Dr. Titus Kivaa P.M.; Applicant: Prof. Paul Mumo Kisau; Applicant: Dr. Gideon Wathe Nzau; Applicant: Florence Mutwali Kitonga; Applicant: Particia Kisio Kimanzi; Applicant: Joseph Muthui Nzuni; Applicant: Margaret Munyoki; Applicant: Solomon Kimanzi Kivoto; Applicant: Eunice Keli Wambua; Applicant: David Kilonzo Maweu; Applicant: John Kimakio Mutia; Applicant: Nzomo Mulatia; Applicant: The Mui Coal Project Blocks C and D Liaison Committee; Respondent: Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Energy; Respondent: Hon Attorney General; Respondent: Principal Secretary, Ministry of Energy and Petroleum; Respondent: Principal Secretary, Ministry of Mining; Respondent: Principal Secretary, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development; Respondent: Fenxi Mining Industry Company Limited; Respondent: Great Lakes Corporation Limited; Respondent: Jingu Group China; Respondent: Commissioner of Mines & Geology; Respondent: National Environment Management Authority; Respondent: Mui Mines and Mineral Limited; Respondent: Law Society of Kenya; Respondent: Institution for Law & Environmental Governance; Respondent: Kituo Cha Sheria; Respondent: Kitui County Government; Respondent: Katiba Institute
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 17 March 2014
- Case Number
- Constitutional Petition 305 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Application to Withdraw and Set Aside Consolidation Order
- Outcome
- Application to set aside consolidation and withdraw Petition 305 of 2012 declined; individual petitioners allowed to withdraw from further participation.
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Litigation, Right to Clean Environment, Right to Property, Public Participation, Access to Information, Mineral Resource Governance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Makau Musyoka
Applicant
Elijah Mutua Makanga
Applicant
Jacob Mbya Musyoka
Applicant
Francis Kithome Kitheka
Applicant
Andrew Kasee Mwinzi
Applicant
Nicholas Munywoki Mwasa
Applicant
Eric Mutua
Applicant
Dr. Titus Kivaa P.M.
Applicant
Prof. Paul Mumo Kisau
Applicant
Dr. Gideon Wathe Nzau
Applicant
Florence Mutwali Kitonga
Applicant
Particia Kisio Kimanzi
Applicant
Joseph Muthui Nzuni
Applicant
Margaret Munyoki
Applicant
Solomon Kimanzi Kivoto
Applicant
Eunice Keli Wambua
Applicant
David Kilonzo Maweu
Applicant
John Kimakio Mutia
Applicant
Nzomo Mulatia
Applicant
The Mui Coal Project Blocks C and D Liaison Committee
Applicant
Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Energy
Respondent
Hon Attorney General
Respondent
Principal Secretary, Ministry of Energy and Petroleum
Respondent
Principal Secretary, Ministry of Mining
Respondent
Principal Secretary, Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development
Respondent
Fenxi Mining Industry Company Limited
Respondent
Great Lakes Corporation Limited
Respondent
Jingu Group China
Respondent
Commissioner of Mines & Geology
Respondent
National Environment Management Authority
Respondent
Mui Mines and Mineral Limited
Respondent
Law Society of Kenya
Respondent
Institution for Law & Environmental Governance
Respondent
Kituo Cha Sheria
Respondent
Kitui County Government
Respondent
Katiba Institute
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Application to Withdraw and Set Aside Consolidation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioners in a public interest constitutional petition can withdraw the petition after consolidation with another petition without adverse effects on public interest.
- 2 Whether withdrawal of Petition 305 of 2012 would prejudice unresolved constitutional issues including right to property, clean environment, and health.
- 3 Whether individual petitioners may withdraw from further participation without affecting the consolidated petition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that withdrawal of Petition 305 of 2012 would have adverse juridical effects on the public interest, as several substantial constitutional issues raised in that petition—such as the right to property, right to a clean and healthy environment, and right to health—were not addressed in Petition 34 of 2013. The court found that Petition 305 of 2012 served as the conceptual foundation for the consolidated proceedings, and its withdrawal would compromise the ability of the parties and the court to fully address the public interest concerns at stake. The court further held that while the consolidated petition could proceed without the individual participation of the original...
Court Disposition
Application to set aside consolidation and withdraw Petition 305 of 2012 declined; individual petitioners allowed to withdraw from further participation.
Orders
- The oral application to set aside the consolidation order of 5th September, 2013 is declined.
- The oral application to withdraw Petition 305 of 2012 is declined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment