[2011] KEHC 4289 (KLR)
The court found that the Public Procurement Oversight Authority failed to exercise its statutory discretion judicially and fairly by not investigating the applicant's procurement complaints or responding substantively to repeated requests. Although Section 102 of the Public Procurement and Disposal Act uses permissive language, the court held that in the circumstances, the respondent was under a duty to act upon the applicant's complaints to uphold the objectives of transparency, accountability, and public confidence in procurement. The respondent's inaction amounted to a failure to discharge its statutory mandate, and the applicant's legitimate expectation of a fair administrative...
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 4289 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Getrio Insurance Brokers Limited; Respondent: Public Procurement Oversight Authority; Interested Party: Canopy Insurance Brokers Limited; Interested Party: Kenya Revenue Authority
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 1 April 2011
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 261 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judicial Review Orders of Mandamus
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Orders of mandamus granted as prayed. Respondent to bear applicant's costs. Interested parties to bear their own costs.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Public Procurement, Mandamus Orders, Discretionary Powers, Statutory Duties
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Getrio Insurance Brokers Limited
Applicant
Public Procurement Oversight Authority
Respondent
Canopy Insurance Brokers Limited
Interested Party
Kenya Revenue Authority
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judicial Review Orders of Mandamus
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Public Procurement Oversight Authority failed to exercise its statutory mandate to investigate procurement complaints as required by the Public Procurement and Disposal Act, 2005.
- 2 Whether the court can compel the exercise of a discretionary statutory power by way of an order of mandamus in the circumstances of this case.
- 3 Whether the applicant was entitled to a fair, transparent, and accountable procurement process and timely communication of tender outcomes.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Public Procurement Oversight Authority failed to exercise its statutory discretion judicially and fairly by not investigating the applicant's procurement complaints or responding substantively to repeated requests. Although Section 102 of the Public Procurement and Disposal Act uses permissive language, the court held that in the circumstances, the respondent was under a duty to act upon the applicant's complaints to uphold the objectives of transparency, accountability, and public confidence in procurement. The respondent's inaction amounted to a failure to discharge its statutory mandate, and the applicant's legitimate expectation of a fair administrative...
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Orders of mandamus granted as prayed. Respondent to bear applicant's costs. Interested parties to bear their own costs.
Orders
- An order of mandamus is issued directing the Public Procurement Oversight Authority to carry out investigations into the circumstances surrounding and leading to the award of Tender No. KRA/HQS/DP002/2009/2010 for provision of Insurance Brokerage Services by the Kenya Revenue Authority, including whether KRA...
- An order of mandamus is issued directing the Public Procurement Oversight Authority to investigate the award of Tender No. KRA/HQS/DP002/2009-2010 for Insurance Brokerage Services for Staff Pension Scheme by KRA, including compliance with the Act, Regulations, and directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment