Ogejo v Republic (Criminal Application E033 of 2025) [2026] KECA 754 (KLR) (24 April 2026) (Ruling)
The application is spent as leave to appeal out of time was already granted in a previous application; no further ruling is necessary.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KECA 754 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kelvin Otieno Ogejo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Application E033 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application spent; file ordered closed.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals, Murder Conviction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kelvin Otieno Ogejo
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time
- 2 Whether multiple applications for extension of time were filed over the same issue
Ratio Decidendi
The application is spent as leave to appeal out of time was already granted in a previous application; no further ruling is necessary.
Court Disposition
Application spent; file ordered closed.
Orders
- File ordered closed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Ogejo v Republic (Criminal Application E033 of 2025) [2026] KECA 754 (KLR) (24 April 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KECA 754 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the Court of Appeal at Kisumu Criminal Application E033 of 2025 HA Omondi, JA April 24, 2026 Between Kelvin Otieno Ogejo Applicant and Republic Respondent (Being an application for extension of time from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Siaya (R.E. Aburili, J) Dated 16th September, 2021 in HCCRA No.7,8 &11 OF 2020(Consolidated) Criminal Case 7,8 & 11 of 2020 ) Ruling 1.The applicant, Kelvin Otieno Ogejo was charged, in Siaya HCCRA No.7,8&11 of 2020(Consolidated)), tried convicted and on 16th September 2021 sentenced to life imprisonment for the offence of murder contrary to section 20 as read with section 203 of the Penal Code (Aburili, J). He was aggrieved by the outcome, and was desirous of filing an appeal and ought to have filed his appeal within 14 days of the decision, but he did not. He then filed an undated application by way of Notice of Motion, seeking leave to appeal out of time. In the supporting affidavit sworn by himself, he explained that due to poor finances, he was not able to pay so as to get his record of appeal prepared. Similarly, his family also had financial challenges, and could not assist hi in pursuit of his appeal. 2.I take note that the applicant had filed a similar application In Kisumu Court of Appeal Criminal Application No. E030 of 2025, Kennedy Otieno Ogejo where he sought extension of time from the Judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Siaya (R.E. Aburili, J.) dated 16th September, 2021, HCCA No.7,8&11 of 2020(Consolidated)). On 21st October 2025, the Court (Kimaru, JA.), allowed the application, and granted the applicant leave to appeal out of time; and to file and serve the notice of appeal within fourteen (14) days thereof. 3.What emerges is that either the applicant filed multiple applications over the same issue, or this was pure an error by the registry, resulting in double registration. Whatever the case, this matter is spent, and I need not write another ruling. The file is ordered closed. DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026.H. A. OMONDI........................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the original.DEPUTY REGISTRAR