[2023] KEHC 103 (KLR)
The High Court found that the trial court's sentence required revision to ensure that the sentences for counts 2 and 3 run concurrently, as they arose from the same transaction. The court also held that the period already served by the applicant should be deducted from the total sentence. The revised sentence...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 103 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Bernard Kimutai Kemboi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E114 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Sentence Revision
- Outcome
- sentence revised
- Judges
- JM Bwonwong'a
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Principles, Revision of Sentence, Concurrent Sentences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Bernard Kimutai Kemboi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Sentence Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed by the trial court was lawful and appropriate.
- 2 Whether the sentences on counts 2 and 3 should run concurrently or consecutively.
- 3 Whether the period already served by the applicant should be considered in the revised sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that the trial court's sentence required revision to ensure that the sentences for counts 2 and 3 run concurrently, as they arose from the same transaction. The court also held that the period already served by the applicant should be deducted from the total sentence. The revised sentence imposed a fine of Kshs. 200,000 on count 1, with a default sentence of one year imprisonment, and a concurrent sentence of two years less two months on counts 2 and 3, effective from the date of conviction. The total imprisonment term was set at three years less two months, reflecting the time already served.
Court Disposition
sentence revised
Orders
- On count 1, the applicant to pay a fine of Kshs. 200,000 or serve one year imprisonment in default.
- On counts 2 and 3, the applicant to serve a concurrent sentence of two years less two months, effective from the date of conviction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Kemboi v Republic (Criminal Revision E114 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 103 (KLR) (Crim) (19 January 2023) (Sentence)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 103 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Criminal
Criminal Revision E114 of 2022
JM Bwonwong'a, J
January 19, 2023
Between
Bernard Kimutai Kemboi
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being a revision of the sentence imposed by Hon. S. Shitubi, CM, on 26/04/2022, in Nairobi CM’S Court in Criminal Case No. 284 of 2018 Bernard Kimutai Kemboi)
Sentence
1. On count 1, appellant to pay a fine of Kshs. 200,000/= in default one year imprisonment.
2. In counts 2 and 3 Appellant to serve a concurrent sentence of two years less 2 months which sentence will run from the date of conviction.
3. In total appellant will serve three (3) years imprisonment less two (2) months.
Judgement signed, dated and issued in Chambers at Nairobi this 19th of January 2023. J M BWONWONG’AJUDGEIn the presence of-Mr. Kinyua: Court Assistant