[2024] KEHC 6008 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 6008 (KLR)

The court found that the Deputy Registrar taxed the Advocate/Client Bill of Costs ex parte without calling for or considering the principal file (Court of Appeal No 72 of 2020) in which the legal services were rendered. The Deputy Registrar also failed to specify the documents relied upon in the taxation process....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 6008 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kemboy Law Advocates; Respondent: Narok County Government
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application E151 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Taxation and Certificate of Costs
Outcome
Taxation and Certificate of Costs set aside; matter remitted for retaxation.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Setting Aside Orders, Advocate Client Bill, Retaxation Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Setting Aside Orders Advocate Client Bill Retaxation Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kemboy Law Advocates

Applicant

Narok County Government

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Taxation and Certificate of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the Deputy Registrar erred in taxing the Advocate/Client Bill of Costs ex parte without calling for the principal file.
  2. 2 Whether the Taxation and Certificate of Costs dated 14th November 2023 should be set aside and the matter remitted for retaxation.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Deputy Registrar taxed the Advocate/Client Bill of Costs ex parte without calling for or considering the principal file (Court of Appeal No 72 of 2020) in which the legal services were rendered. The Deputy Registrar also failed to specify the documents relied upon in the taxation process. This omission amounted to a procedural irregularity and denied the parties the benefit of a fair and transparent taxation process. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion to set aside the Taxation and Certificate of Costs dated 14th November 2023 and directed that the matter be remitted to the Deputy Registrar for retaxation, but only after calling for and considering...

Court Disposition

Taxation and Certificate of Costs set aside; matter remitted for retaxation.

Orders

  • The Taxation and Certificate of Costs dated 14th November 2023 are set aside.
  • The file is returned to the Deputy Registrar to retax the Bill of Costs dated 31st August 2023 only after calling for the principal file Court of Appeal No 72 of 2020.