[2024] KEELC 490 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 490 (KLR)

The court found that the application to stay proceedings and arrest the ruling was misconceived because the ruling sought to be arrested had already been delivered and the proceedings sought to be stayed had already taken place. The court emphasized that such applications must be made before the actions in question...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 490 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Yobensia Kemunto Kemoni; Plaintiff: Margaret Nyaitondi Gwoma; Defendant: Geoffrey Mangera Omwoyo
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 105 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Ruling / Application to Stay Proceedings and Arrest Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Judges
JM Kamau
Legal Topics
Execution of Judgment, Survey and Boundaries, Stay of Proceedings
Source Language
en
Land and Property Execution of Judgment Survey and Boundaries Stay of Proceedings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yobensia Kemunto Kemoni

Plaintiff

Margaret Nyaitondi Gwoma

Plaintiff

Geoffrey Mangera Omwoyo

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Ruling / Application to Stay Proceedings and Arrest Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the court should stay proceedings conducted before the Deputy Registrar on 26th October 2023.
  2. 2 Whether the court should arrest the Ruling delivered on 16th November 2023 pending implementation of a prior court order for a survey revisit.
  3. 3 Whether the Notice to Show Cause dated 21/3/2019 should be stayed or set aside pending hearing of another application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the application to stay proceedings and arrest the ruling was misconceived because the ruling sought to be arrested had already been delivered and the proceedings sought to be stayed had already taken place. The court emphasized that such applications must be made before the actions in question occur. Since there was nothing left to stay or arrest, the application was disallowed with costs to the respondent.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application dated 5/11/2023 is disallowed with costs.
  • There is nothing to stay or arrest as the ruling has already been delivered and proceedings have already taken place.