[2007] KEHC 3385 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent deserted the petitioner for no just cause for a period exceeding three years prior to the filing of the petition. The petitioner's evidence was unchallenged and credible, establishing the ground of desertion under the Marriage Act. The court was satisfied that the legal...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2007] KEHC 3385 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Kenn Karori Njoroge; Respondent: Agnes Kabuiya Karori
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Divorce Cause 61 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition allowed; marriage dissolved
- Judges
- JA Aluoch
- Legal Topics
- Divorce, Matrimonial Desertion, Custody of Children, Marriage Act, Customary Marriage
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenn Karori Njoroge
Petitioner
Agnes Kabuiya Karori
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent deserted the petitioner without just cause for a continuous period of at least three years preceding the petition.
- 2 Whether the petitioner is entitled to dissolution of marriage on grounds of desertion.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent deserted the petitioner for no just cause for a period exceeding three years prior to the filing of the petition. The petitioner's evidence was unchallenged and credible, establishing the ground of desertion under the Marriage Act. The court was satisfied that the legal requirements for dissolution of marriage on the ground of desertion were met and accordingly granted the decree nisi, to be made absolute within 30 days.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; marriage dissolved
Orders
- The marriage between the petitioner and respondent solemnized on 5th April 1993 is dissolved.
- A decree nisi shall issue immediately and be made absolute within 30 days from the date of judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Divorce Cause 61 of 2006
KENN KARORI NJOROGE……………………….PETITIONER
VERSUS
AGNES KABUIYA KARORI……………………RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
KENN KARORI NJOROGE petitioned the court for divorce from his wife AGNES KABUIYA KARORI, whom he married at the office of the Registrar General Nairobi, on 5th April, 1993. A copy of the marriage certificate was attached to the petition.
The couple lived and cohabited as shown in para 2 of the petition, and they were blessed with 4 children whose names and ages appear in para 3 of the petition.
The petitioner stated in para 12 of the petition that, the petition,
“is neither presented nor prosecuted in collusion with the respondent, nor has he condoned the neglect, cruelty or desertion of the respondent, alleged in the petition”.
The petitioner is a small scale farmer, started cohabiting with Agnes, the respondent in 1979, and a year later in 1980, they performed a customary law marriage, and in 1993, they solemnized their marriage and conducted a ceremony at the Registrar General’s office in Nairobi, under the Marriage Act.
He testified that Agnes left the matrimonial home in Ngumba estate Nairobi on 1. 5.1998. She did not say where she was going, and has never returned.
The petitioner went to Githunguri to see his mother in law and enquired about his wife. He learnt that his wife did stop there, but subsequently left without saying where she was going. The petitioner was, however, noted that his mother in law was not surprised about the non return of Agnes. He concluded that Agnes’ mother must have known where she was.
The petitioner left, but about one month later, Agnes called him and said she was in the USA. She did not give a phone number or any address and since that call, she has not communicated again.
Agnes left all the 4 children behind. The petitioner looks after them and maintains them. They are all grown now aged above 18 years old.
The petitioner added that he did not consent to the desertion by Agnes which occurred when there was no problem in the marriage. He prayed for costs of the suit.
Written submissions were made on behalf of the petitioner, which I have considered. I also considered that the petitioner’s evidence though not corroborated was not challenged. I believed the evidence and from it find that the respondent deserted the petitioner for no just cause, for a period of 3 years preceding the presentation of this divorce petition. I therefore proceed to dissolve the marriage between the petitioner and respondent, solemnized on 5th April 1993. Each party will pay their own expenses.
Finally I direct that the decree nisi do issue today, and the same be made absolute within a period of 30 days from today.
Dated at Nairobi this 27th day of September, 2007.
JOYCE ALUOCH
JUDGE