[2018] KEELC 3685 (KLR)

[2018] KEELC 3685 (KLR)

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant failed to specify any error on the face of the record, as required for such applications. Upon independent examination, the court found no error in its previous ruling. Furthermore, the court held that the prayer for stay of eviction had already been raised and determined...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEELC 3685 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Kennedy Khisa Kundu; Defendant: John Kundu Khisa
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kitale
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Land Case 152 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Rectify Error and for Stay of Eviction
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs to the defendant/respondent.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Rectification of Record, Stay of Eviction, Res Judicata
Source Language
en
Land and Property Rectification of Record Stay of Eviction Res Judicata

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kennedy Khisa Kundu

Plaintiff

John Kundu Khisa

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Rectify Error and for Stay of Eviction

  1. 1 Whether there is an error apparent on the face of the record that warrants rectification.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of eviction should be granted pending further orders.
  3. 3 Whether the issues raised in the application are res judicata.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff/applicant failed to specify any error on the face of the record, as required for such applications. Upon independent examination, the court found no error in its previous ruling. Furthermore, the court held that the prayer for stay of eviction had already been raised and determined in a prior application, rendering the issue res judicata. Consequently, the application lacked merit and was dismissed with costs to the defendant/respondent.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs to the defendant/respondent.

Orders

  • The application dated 13/12/2017 is dismissed with costs to the defendant/respondent.