[2018] KEHC 2391 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 2391 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely the late receipt of instructions from the Insurance Company. The court also noted that liability in the lower court was settled by consent, and the only issue on appeal would be quantum. In balancing...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 2391 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kennedy Kifunya Kalaha; Respondent: Beatrice Bugutsa Makati; Respondent: Jack Wanjala Khisa (Suing as the administrator of the Estate of Brian Namasake Wakhisi – Deceased)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Application 8 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
Application allowed in part.
Judges
SN Riechi
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Leave to Appeal Out of Time Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kennedy Kifunya Kalaha

Applicant

Beatrice Bugutsa Makati

Respondent

Jack Wanjala Khisa (Suing as the administrator of the Estate of Brian Namasake Wakhisi – Deceased)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution and Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to appeal out of time against the judgment in Bungoma CMCC 559/2016.
  2. 2 Whether a stay of execution of the decree should be granted pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had provided a reasonable explanation for the delay in filing the appeal, namely the late receipt of instructions from the Insurance Company. The court also noted that liability in the lower court was settled by consent, and the only issue on appeal would be quantum. In balancing the interests of both parties, the court granted leave to appeal out of time and ordered a stay of execution on condition that the applicant deposits the entire decretal sum in a joint interest-earning account. This approach ensures that the respondent's interests are protected while allowing the applicant to exercise the right of appeal.

Court Disposition

Application allowed in part.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal out of time is granted to the applicant.
  • Applicant to file appeal within 30 days from the date of the ruling.