[2020] KEHC 1169 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay in filing his appeal. The only reason advanced was lack of legal fees, which the court held is not a sufficient excuse, as filing a petition of appeal does not require payment of fees and the applicant had demonstrated ability to file...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 1169 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kennedy Kipkoech Cheruiyot alias Kipkemoi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Narok
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application 36 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
- Outcome
- applications dismissed
- Judges
- F Gikonyo
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Inordinate Delay, Good Cause Requirement, Defilement Conviction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kennedy Kipkoech Cheruiyot alias Kipkemoi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for failure to file an appeal within the prescribed time.
- 2 Whether lack of legal fees constitutes sufficient reason for delay in filing an appeal.
- 3 Whether the delay of eight years in seeking leave to appeal out of time is excusable.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate good cause for the delay in filing his appeal. The only reason advanced was lack of legal fees, which the court held is not a sufficient excuse, as filing a petition of appeal does not require payment of fees and the applicant had demonstrated ability to file other applications without legal representation. The court also noted that the applicant did not substantiate his claim of having filed an appeal at Nakuru, and that the delay of eight years was inordinate and inexcusable in the absence of a reasonable explanation. Consequently, the court exercised its discretion against the applicant and dismissed both applications for leave...
Court Disposition
applications dismissed
Orders
- Narok HC Misc. Cr. Application No. 36 of 2018 is dismissed.
- Narok HC Misc. Cr. Application No. 13 of 2020 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAROK
MISC CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO 36 OF 2018 & 13 OF 2020
KENNEDY KIPKOECH CHERUIYOTalias KIPKEMOI......APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC ............................................................................... RESPONDENT
RULING
Leave to appeal out of time
1. The applicant filed two applications to wit: Narok HC Misc. Cr. Appl. No. 36 of 2018 and No. 13 of 2020. The two applications relate to NAROK SOA CASE NO. 1154 OF 2011. In the former case, he filed a petition of appeal supported by an affidavit sworn by him. In that affidavit, he stated at paragraph 4 thereof that, he filed an appeal at Nakuru but his file was transferred to Narok High Court, and on 13/2/2019 he was summoned to court only to find that his petition of appeal has not been filed in court. At paragraph 5 thereof, he sought leave of court to allow his appeal out of time.
2. In Narok HC Misc. Cr. Application No. 13 of 2020 he is seeking leave of court to file appeal out of time. In the Notice of Motion and the affidavit in support, he stated that he was convicted and sentenced on 3/11/2012 to serve a 20 years’ jail term for defilement. The motion is anchored on article 50 (6) (a) (b) of the constitution. He explained why he did not file appeal in time: Lack of legal fee.
3. The state counsel, Ms. Sharon Koina, submitted that the state filed a replying affidavit in opposition to the application. It was deposed that judgment to be appealed from was pronounced 8 years ago. Thus, there has been inordinate delay which has not been explained to the satisfaction of the court. She took the view that the applicant filed these applications himself – something he would have done with the appeal. Accordingly, she took the view that lack of fees is not an issue, but, merely an excuse. She accused him of not being diligent and so she prayed that these applications be dismissed.
4. According to section 349 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 75) Laws of Kenya
“An appeal shall be entered within fourteen days of the date of the order or sentence appealed against: Provided that the court to which the appeal is made may for good cause admit an appeal after the period of fourteen days has elapsed, and shall so admit an appeal if it is satisfied that the failure to enter the appeal within that period has been caused by the inability of the appellant or his advocate to obtain a copy of the judgment or order appealed against, and a copy of the record, within a reasonable time of applying to the court therefor.”
5. Therefore, the applicant must show good cause why he did not file appeal in time. Of central consideration is inability to obtain the judgment and proceedings in time. The applicant has established that inability to obtain judgement and or proceedings prevented him from filing appeal in time. He merely stated that his family did not have the legal fee to file appeal. I agree with Ms. Torosi’s averment that fee is not an issue here as he would still have filed a petition of appeal at no cost just as he did with Misc Cri. App. No 36 of 2018 and 20 of 2020. I note also that the applicant did not substantiate the claim that he filed an appeal at Nakuru. In any event, if he filed an appeal in Nakuru, then subsequent applications such as the ones before me would be an abuse of the process of court.
6. Be that as it may, 8 years has passed since his conviction and sentences- this is a considerable period of time for a person to wait before coming to court for leave to appeal out of time. And in law, the period becomes inordinate delay and inexcusable if no reasonable explanation is given for the delay. The explanation given by the applicant that his family did not have legal fee to file appeal is a mere excuse. Accordingly, I find that the applicant has not shown any good cause for which I can exercise my discretion in his favour. In the upshot, I dismiss application No. 36 of 2018 as well as No. 13 of 2020. In accordance with the proceedings for 18/11/2020, this ruling be placed in each of the two files to which it relates.
Dated, signed and delivered at Narok through Teams Application this 9th day of December 2020
-----------------------
F. GIKONYO
JUDGE
In the Presence of:
1. Ms. Koina for the State
2. The appellant in person
3. Court Assistant – Mr. Kasaso