[2018] KEHC 4629 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 4629 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay in seeking leave to appeal out of time. Furthermore, the applicant did not provide any material evidence to support his claim of indigency as required for consideration as a poor person. Additionally, the applicant did not frame...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 4629 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kennedy Ochieng Ahuba; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 45 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal Out of Time, Indigency and Poor Person Status, Appellate Procedure
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Out of Time Indigency and Poor Person Status Appellate Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kennedy Ochieng Ahuba

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated sufficient cause for delay in filing the appeal out of time.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant qualifies as a poor person to be granted leave to appeal as such.
  3. 3 Whether any point of law has been raised to warrant leave to appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for the delay in seeking leave to appeal out of time. Furthermore, the applicant did not provide any material evidence to support his claim of indigency as required for consideration as a poor person. Additionally, the applicant did not frame any point or question of law for the Court of Appeal's consideration, which is a prerequisite for granting leave to appeal out of time in a second appeal. Consequently, the application was found to be without merit and was dismissed, with the applicant ordered to serve the lawful sentence previously imposed and upheld by the court.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal out of time is dismissed.
  • The convict to serve the lawful sentence meted out and upheld by this Court.