[2014] KEHC 8792 (KLR)
The court found that the appellant's plea of guilty was clear and unequivocal, and that he understood the proceedings and admitted to facts that disclosed the offence. However, the sentence of seven years imprisonment was deemed harsh and excessive, especially considering the appellant was a first offender, pleaded...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 8792 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Kennedy Odhiambo Odhiambo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Homa Bay
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 4 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed_in_part
- Judges
- DAS Majanja
- Legal Topics
- Stock Theft, Sentencing Principles, Plea of Guilty
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kennedy Odhiambo Odhiambo
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plea of guilty was unequivocal and valid.
- 2 Whether the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive in the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the appellant's plea of guilty was clear and unequivocal, and that he understood the proceedings and admitted to facts that disclosed the offence. However, the sentence of seven years imprisonment was deemed harsh and excessive, especially considering the appellant was a first offender, pleaded guilty, was remorseful, and the stolen sheep were recovered. The magistrate failed to provide reasons for imposing such a sentence. The court therefore quashed the sentence and substituted it with a sentence of time served, ordering the appellant's release unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed_in_part
Orders
- The sentence of seven years imprisonment is quashed and substituted with a sentence of time served.
- The appellant shall be set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
IN THE HIGH COURT AT HOMA BAY
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 4 OF 2014
BETWEEN
KENNEDY ODHIAMBO ODHIAMBO ……….…… APPLICANT
AND
REPUBLIC ………………………………………. RESPONDENT
(Being an appeal from the original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 174 of 2012 of the Chief Magistrates Court at Oyugis, Hon. M. Kiema, RM dated 21st March 2012)
JUDGMENT
The appellant, KENNEDY ODHIAMBO ODHIAMBO was charged with the offence of stealing stock contrary to section 278 of the Penal Code(Chapter 63 of the Laws of Kenya). It was alleged that on 10th March 2012 at Kanyna sub location in Rachuonyo South District within Homa Bay County with other not before the court he stole two sheep valued at Kshs. 2,300/= the property of Simon Opar Amadi. He also faced an alternative charge of handling stolen property contrary to section 327(2) of the Penal Code based on the same facts.
He was arraigned in court and pleaded guilty on the principal charge on his own volition. He was sentenced to serve 7 years imprisonment.He now appeals against the conviction and sentence.
I have considered the plea and I find that it was clear and unequivocal. The appellant understood the proceedings and the facts that were read to him disclosed the offence which he admitted. I affirm the conviction.
As regards the sentence, Mr. Oluoch, learned counsel for the State, concedes that sentence was harsh and excessive in the circumstances. The magistrate did not set out the basis for imposing the sentence of seven years yet the accused was a pleaded guilty, was a first offender and was remorseful and the stolen sheep were recovered.
The appellant has been in custody since 21st March 2012. He has served sufficient time.
The appeal is allowed to the extent that the sentence is quashed and substituted with that of time served. The appellant shall be set free unless otherwise lawfully held.
DATED and DELIVERED at HOMA BAY this 1st day of August 2014
D. S. MAJANJA
JUDGE