[2018] KEELRC 1239 (KLR)
The court found that the respondent was duly served in person with the memorandum of claim and summons to enter appearance, as evidenced by a proper affidavit of service filed by the process server. The respondent failed to file any response for over five years and did not seek to cross-examine the process server or...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEELRC 1239 (KLR)
- Parties
- Claimant: Kennedy Omondi; Respondent: Charles New Nyamote
- Court
- Employment and Labour Relations Court
- Court Station
- Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Cause 2373 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- MN Nduma, DO Ogal
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Service of Process, Setting Aside Judgment, Employment Relationship
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kennedy Omondi
Claimant
Charles New Nyamote
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent was duly served with the memorandum of claim and summons to enter appearance.
- 2 Whether the respondent has a justifiable cause to set aside the default judgment.
- 3 Whether there existed an employment relationship between the claimant and the respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondent was duly served in person with the memorandum of claim and summons to enter appearance, as evidenced by a proper affidavit of service filed by the process server. The respondent failed to file any response for over five years and did not seek to cross-examine the process server or provide credible evidence of non-service. The court held that the respondent's application to set aside the default judgment lacked merit, as there was no justifiable cause for the delay and the respondent was caught by the doctrine of laches. Furthermore, the court was satisfied that an employment relationship existed between the parties, and the respondent had no arguable...
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application to set aside the judgment of the court is dismissed.
- The interim orders are discharged.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND LABOUR RELATIONS COURT
AT NAIROBI
CAUSE NO. 2373 OF 2012
(Before Hon. Justice Mathews N. Nduma)
KENNEDY OMONDI........................................CLAIMANT
VERSUS
CHARLES NEW NYAMOTE......................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. Default Judgment in favour of the Claimant was delivered on 19th May, 2017.
2. Application to set aside the default judgment was filed on 18th September, 2017 and Hon. Lady Justice Ndolo granted interim orders on 20th September, 2017.
3. Replying Affidavit was filed on 2nd October, 2017 and the parties filed their submissions on 17th October, 2017 and 29th November, 2017 respectively. Interim orders were extended.
4. The file was transmitted and received in Kisumu on 18th January, 2018 providing that ruling will be on notice.
5. At the time the application was filed on 5th September, 2017 goods had been proclaimed pending execution.
6. The Applicant stated that the Memorandum of Claim with Summons to Enter Appearance were never served. That the Respondent has a good defence which discloses triable issues and in particular that the Respondent did not at all employ the Claimant and this was a false employment claim.
7. The Application is opposed vide the Replying Affidavit of the claimant stating that the application is frivolous, vexatious and a waste of precious court’s time.
8. That the Applicant has not in the application sought to cross examine the process server and therefore he is unable to demonstrate to the court that he was not served on the face of a proper service having been done on the Applicant on 4th December, 2012 and an Affidavit of Service duly filed.
9. The Court is satisfied that the Respondent/Applicant was duly served in person by one Benjamin Mutua on 14th December, 2012 in his office at St. Charles Mutegi Educational Centre, along Lenana – Mutuine Road.
10. That a proper Affidavit of Service sworn by the process server on 9th January, 2017 was filed in court on 14th February, 2017.
11. The Respondent did not file any statement of response for a period of more than five years. The suit proceeded to formal proof on 15th February, 2017 and Judgment delivered on 19th May, 2017.
12. The Respondent has no justifiable cause at all to persuade the court to set aside its judgment. The Respondent is caught by the doctrine of laches and any further delay in this matter will amount to grave injustice against the Claimant.
13. The court is satisfied from the statement of claim, vivavoce evidence by the Claimant and the documentary evidence produced in court that there was an employment relationship between the Claimant and the Respondent. The Respondent has no arguable defence in the circumstances of this case.
14. The Application to set aside the judgment of the court is dismissed and the interim orders discharged.
Dated and Signed in Kisumu this 20th day of July, 2018
Mathews N. Nduma
Judge
Delivered and signed in Nairobi this 10th day of August,2018
Maureen Onyango
Judge
Appearances
Mr. Nyabena for Respondent/Applicant
Mr. Ogwe for Claimant/Respondent
Anne Njung’e – Court Clerk