[2021] KEHC 8793 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 8793 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had not provided a good reason for failing to file submissions within the extended period granted by the court. Despite being given additional time and clear directions, the applicant neither filed submissions nor attached any draft submissions to the application. The court held...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 8793 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Kennedy Ooko Jacob t/a SSEBO Intel. Co. Auctioneer; Respondent: John Abich Ochanda
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Migori
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Civil Appeal 18 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Stay Judgment and for Leave to File Submissions Out of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RPV Wendoh
Legal Topics
Stay of Judgment, Late Filing of Submissions, Court Discretion
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Stay of Judgment Late Filing of Submissions Court Discretion

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kennedy Ooko Jacob t/a SSEBO Intel. Co. Auctioneer

Appellant

John Abich Ochanda

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Appeal / Ruling on Notice of Motion to Stay Judgment and for Leave to File Submissions Out of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient reason to warrant a stay or suspension of the delivery of judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file and serve submissions on the appeal out of time.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had not provided a good reason for failing to file submissions within the extended period granted by the court. Despite being given additional time and clear directions, the applicant neither filed submissions nor attached any draft submissions to the application. The court held that there was no justification to defer or suspend the delivery of judgment, and that the applicant's lack of diligence did not warrant the exercise of the court's discretion in his favour. Consequently, the notice of motion was dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 23/2/2021 is dismissed.