[2017] KEELRC 487 (KLR)

[2017] KEELRC 487 (KLR)

The court found that the Respondent failed to provide the Claimant with an opportunity to respond to the allegations leading to his dismissal, thereby violating the procedural fairness requirements of Section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007. Additionally, the Respondent did not establish a valid reason for the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2017] KEELRC 487 (KLR)
Parties
Claimant: Kennedy Wafula; Respondent: Wells Fargo Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 2253 of 2012
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
judgment for the claimant
Judges
L Ndolo
Legal Topics
Summary Dismissal, Procedural Fairness, Unlawful Termination, Remedies for Wrongful Dismissal
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Summary Dismissal Procedural Fairness Unlawful Termination Remedies for Wrongful Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kennedy Wafula

Claimant

Wells Fargo Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Claimant’s dismissal was lawful and fair.
  2. 2 Whether the Claimant is entitled to the remedies sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Respondent failed to provide the Claimant with an opportunity to respond to the allegations leading to his dismissal, thereby violating the procedural fairness requirements of Section 41 of the Employment Act, 2007. Additionally, the Respondent did not establish a valid reason for the dismissal as required by Section 43 of the Act. As a result, the summary dismissal was both substantively and procedurally unfair. The court awarded the Claimant compensation equivalent to ten months’ salary, one month’s salary in lieu of notice, salary for days worked up to the date of dismissal, uniform refund, overtime compensation, and prorata leave. The claim for gratuity was...

Court Disposition

judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs. 132,736 as detailed in the judgment.
  • The amount shall attract interest at court rates from the date of judgment until payment in full.