[2020] KEHC 7589 (KLR)
The court found that following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional, necessitating resentencing. The court considered the period already served by the petitioner (17 years), his rehabilitation efforts, the absence of injury to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 7589 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Kennedy Wesonga Kwoba; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 1 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Resentencing Petition After Conviction and Appeals Dismissed
- Outcome
- petition allowed; petitioner re-sentenced to period served
- Judges
- TW Cherere
- Legal Topics
- Resentencing, Mandatory Sentencing, Robbery With Violence, Constitutional Rights, Mitigation, Custodial Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kennedy Wesonga Kwoba
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Resentencing Petition After Conviction and Appeals Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner is entitled to resentencing following the Supreme Court decision declaring the mandatory death sentence unconstitutional.
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the petitioner considering the circumstances of the offence and the period already served.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence is unconstitutional, necessitating resentencing. The court considered the period already served by the petitioner (17 years), his rehabilitation efforts, the absence of injury to the complainant, and the fact that he is a first offender. Applying the Sentencing Policy Guidelines and section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the court determined that the appropriate sentence is the period already served, thereby ordering the petitioner's immediate release unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
petition allowed; petitioner re-sentenced to period served
Orders
- The petitioner is hereby re-sentenced to the period already served.
- The petitioner shall be released from custody forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KISUMU
(CORAM: CHERERE-J)
PETITION NO. 01 OF 2020
BETWEEN
KENNEDY WESONGA KWOBA.......PETITIONER
AND
REPUBLIC..........................................RESPONDENT
JUDGEMENT
Introduction
1. On 27th June, 2003, the trial court in BUSIA CRIMINAL CASE NO.1061 OF 2002, convicted and sentenced the Petitioner to death for robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2)of the Penal Code. Petitioner lodged an appeal BUNGOMA HIGH COURT CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 151 OF 2003which was dismissed on 30th July, 2009 whereupon the conviction and sentence was upheld. The Petitioner subsequently appealed to the Court of Appeal in KISUMU CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 276 OF 2009which similarly upheld his conviction and sentence by a judgment dated 30th October, 2014.
2. By a petition filed on 13th January, 2020, the Petitioner has petitioned this court for resentencing.
3. Ms. Gathu, learned counsel for the state submitted that the petition was not opposed and proposed that the Petitioner be sentenced to an imprisonment term of 20 years from date of conviction for the reason that the complainant was robbed but was not injured.
Analysis and Determination
4. At the time of the petitioner’s conviction, death was the only available sentence for robbery with violence and imprisonment for a term of not less than fifteen years but which may be enhanced to imprisonment for life for the offence of rape.
5. The Supreme Court’s decision in Francis Karioki Muruatetu & Another v Republic & 5 others [2016] eKLR declaring the mandatory death sentence unconstitutional has necessitated resentencing of all persons previously sentenced to the mandatory death sentence.
6. I have considered The Sentencing Policy Guidelines, 2016and its application which is intended to promote transparency, consistency and fairness in sentencing (See Michael Kathewa Laichena & another v Republic [2018] eKLR).
7. Under the proviso to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Chapter 75 of the Laws of Kenya), the court is entitled to take into account the period the petitioner has spent in custody in determining the sentence. The court record shows that the petitioner has served 13 years since the date of conviction.
8. The Petitioner has served 17 years. As a way of reformation, Petitioner has undertaken upholstering and has attained a GRADE I certificate. He has also obtained a certificate in Health Education. He has the potential for productive life outside prison. After considering all the mitigating and aggravating factors, and the fact that the Petitioner is a first offender, I re-sentence him to the period served.
DELIVERED AND SIGNED IN KISUMU THIS 05thDAY OF March 2020
T. W. CHERERE
JUDGE
In the presence of-
Court Assistant - Amondi/Okodoi
Petitioner - Present in person
For the State - Ms. Gathu