[2018] KEHC 2636 (KLR)
The court found that the petitioner failed to meet the statutory requirements for a bankruptcy order. Specifically, he did not provide a full inventory and valuation of his assets, particularly the parcel of land Karingani/Ndagani/8600, nor did he file a complete statement of his financial position. Additionally, he...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 2636 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kenneth Kinyua Ephantus; Respondent: Insolvency Act
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Chuka
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Bankruptcy Cause 1 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Bankruptcy Petition / Ruling
- Outcome
- petition disallowed
- Judges
- BB Limo
- Legal Topics
- Personal Insolvency, Bankruptcy Petition Requirements, Creditor Notification, Asset Disclosure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kenneth Kinyua Ephantus
Applicant
Insolvency Act
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bankruptcy Petition / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the petitioner has established sufficient grounds for a bankruptcy order under the Insolvency Act 2015.
- 2 Whether the petitioner has provided a full inventory and valuation of assets as required.
- 3 Whether the petitioner has complied with statutory requirements for publication and disclosure.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the petitioner failed to meet the statutory requirements for a bankruptcy order. Specifically, he did not provide a full inventory and valuation of his assets, particularly the parcel of land Karingani/Ndagani/8600, nor did he file a complete statement of his financial position. Additionally, he failed to publish the petition in a newspaper circulating within the relevant counties where his creditors reside. These omissions are fatal to the petition, as compliance with these procedural and substantive requirements is mandatory under the Insolvency Act 2015. Consequently, the court disallowed the petition for bankruptcy.
Court Disposition
petition disallowed
Orders
- The petition for a bankruptcy order is disallowed.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT CHUKA
BANKRUPTCY CASE NO. 1 OF 2018
(FORMERLY MERU HIGH COURT BANKRUPTCY NO.2 OF 2018)
KENNETH KINYUA EPHANTUS...............................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
INSOLVENCY ACT......................................................................RESPONDENT
R U L I N G
1. KENNETH KINYUA EPHANTUS has petitioned this court for an order of insolvency under Section 32 of the Insolvency Act 2015.
2. The Petitioner have averred that he is a business person operating a small bakery with his wife in Chuka town and that he has been experiencing financial problems from 2010 to 2013 due to unfaithful employees. He has further stated that he had taken a loan of Kshs.300,000/- from C.F.C Bank which he serviced until 2013 when he was unable to further service the debt. As a result he was sued by the bank and the court decreed that he pays the whole amount plus interest which totalled up to Kshs.433,985/- .He further states that he obtained a loan from Centenary Sacco of Kshs.100,000/- managed to repay only Kshs.30,000/-.
He further states that the only property he owns is that parcel of land known as Karingani/Ndagani/8600 while the total debts are;
(i) Fredrick Marangu - Kshs.433,985/-
(ii) CFC Bank - Kshs.300,000/-
(iii) Centenary Sacco - Kshs.70,000/-
(iv) Joset Auctioneers - Kshs.67,343/-
(v) Justin Mugendi - Kshs.50,000/-
Total - Kshs.887,343/-
3. This court has considered this petition and the grounds upon which it has been brought. This court is not satisfied that the petitioner has established sufficient grounds for a bankruptcy order. He has failed to give a full inventory of his assets and their valuations particularly Karingani/Ndagani/866. The Petitioner has also failed to file a full statement regarding his financial position. He has also failed to publish his petition in a newspaper circulating within Tharaka Nithi and Meru County where his creditors ordinarily reside. This petition is therefore disallowed with no order as to costs.
Dated, signed and delivered at Chuka this 7th day of November, 2018.
R.K. LIMO
JUDGE
7/11/2018
Ruling signed, dated and delivered in the presence of the applicant.
R.K. LIMO
JUDGE
7/11/2018